Pivotal clinical trials with patient-reported outcome measures in premarket approval applications for high-risk medical devices from 2005 to 2018: Review, examples, and regulatory considerations

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Shankara, Sravya B. [3 ]
Guo, Jing [4 ]
Zhang, Hui [5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Inst Ctr Clin & Translat Res, Biostat & Res Design Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Chan Med Sch, TH Chan Sch Med, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Clinical trial; Medical devices; Patient-reported outcome; Food and drug administration; Design and analysis of confirmatory clinical; trials; MULTIPLICITY ADJUSTMENT METHODS; AMENDMENTS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2022.106757
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are key to reflecting the patient experience and patient perspective when developing new medical devices. The PRO measures used in pivotal clinical trials for investigational medical devices are miscellaneous and diversified. Methods: This article analyzes and presents the trend and distribution of the use of PRO measures in the pivotal clinical trials for high-risk medical devices regulated and approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2005 to 2018 through Premarket Approval (PMA). Results: As clinical endpoints in pivotal clinical trials, the use of PRO measures in FDA-approved PMA applications for high-risk Class III medical devices significantly increased from September 2005 to December 2018. The percentage of PRO use peaked at the years 2014 and 2015 and remains high till 2018. The most used PRO measure among these PMAs was the 36-Item Short Form Survey quality-of-life questionnaire. Three examples are further elaborated in this article to show how the pivotal clinical trials are designed and analyzed with PRO measures as their clinical endpoints for FDA-regulated high-risk medical devices. The article also reiterates regulatory perspectives and considerations from the FDA. Conclusion: The regulatory perspectives and considerations provided by the FDA on evaluating PRO instruments and design and analysis of pivotal clinical trials with PRO measures should be closely followed in the development process of new medical devices.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Characteristics and use of patient-reported outcomes of clinical trials for high-risk neurological medical devices that received FDA premarket approval from 2001 to 2022
    Ryan, Morgan E.
    Srivastava, Siddharth
    Wan, Lin
    Yang, Guang
    Zhang, Bo
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 37
  • [2] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in High-Risk Medical Device Registries: A Scoping Review
    Merenda, Michelle
    Earnest, Arul
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Tse, Wai Chung
    Elder, Elisabeth
    Hopper, Ingrid
    Ahern, Susannah
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM, 2024, 6
  • [3] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for high-risk skin cancer patients
    Reinhardt, Myrna Eliann
    Sun, Tiffany
    Pan, Catherina X.
    Lee, Erica H.
    Waldman, Abigail B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 85 (03) : AB5 - AB5
  • [4] LITERATURE REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: TRENDS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE CLINICAL TRIALS
    Gorsh, B.
    Perera, S.
    Eliason, L.
    Molinari, A.
    Hanna, M.
    Landi, S.
    Nair, S.
    Chakraborty, A.
    Carmichael, C.
    Patel, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S446 - S446
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures for use in clinical trials of SLE: a review (vol 5, e000279, 2018)
    Izadi, Z.
    Gandrup, J.
    Katz, P. P.
    LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2018, 5 (01):
  • [6] Evidence from clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children: a scoping review
    Kathrin Guerlich
    Bernadeta Patro-Golab
    Paulina Dworakowski
    Alan G. Fraser
    Michael Kammermeier
    Tom Melvin
    Berthold Koletzko
    Pediatric Research, 2024, 95 : 615 - 624
  • [7] Evidence from clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children: a scoping review
    Guerlich, Kathrin
    Patro-Golab, Bernadeta
    Dworakowski, Paulina
    Fraser, Alan G.
    Kammermeier, Michael
    Melvin, Tom
    Koletzko, Berthold
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2024, 95 (03) : 615 - 624
  • [8] Registration, publication, and outcome reporting among pivotal clinical trials that supported FDA approval of high-risk cardiovascular devices before and after FDAAA
    Swanson, Matthew J.
    Johnston, James L.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [9] Registration, publication, and outcome reporting among pivotal clinical trials that supported FDA approval of high-risk cardiovascular devices before and after FDAAA
    Matthew J. Swanson
    James L. Johnston
    Joseph S. Ross
    Trials, 22
  • [10] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE APPROVAL AND CLINICAL USE OF HIGH-RISK MEDICAL DEVICES IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE: AN UPDATE FROM THE CORE-MD CONSORTIUM
    McGovern, L.
    Siontis, G.
    Frenk, A.
    Melvin, T.
    McGauran, G.
    Geertsma, R.
    Schnell-Inderst, P.
    Fraser, Ag
    Windecker, S.
    Byrne, R.
    HEART, 2022, 108 : A21 - A21