Corridor preservation - Best practices for local governments

被引:0
|
作者
Williams, KM [1 ]
Frey, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Ctr Urban Transportat Res, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Corridor preservation is an issue of growing concern. The costs of providing transportation infrastructure are escalating, particularly in growing urbanized areas. Right-of-way (ROW) costs often represent the single largest expenditure for a transportation improvement. ROW becomes so costly that jurisdictions are unable to provide needed transportation infrastructure, the existing system will fail to function as planned, and quality of life will suffer. It is critical for local governments to work within their authority to ensure that land for future transportation facilities is preserved as development occurs. Better coordination of land use and transportation decisions will result in a variety of benefits, including earlier public notification of the ROW needs for planned road improvements, less need to relocate homes or businesses when improvements are made, and less damage to existing sites when the land is acquired. Many jurisdictions have some method of ROW preservation, but most lack a systematic program for preserving ROW and managing access. Those that have succeeded have assembled a variety of tools they can mix and match to the circumstances at hand. No single method works for all situations or is legally available in every state. The following measures can help ensure a more successful program: develop a long-range transportation plan with broad community support, set clear priorities and complete projects on time, establish an advance acquisition funding source, establish a systematic program of policies and regulations, and provide a range of mitigation measures to address potential hardships and preserve property rights.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands)
    Hoppe, Thomas
    Graf, Antonia
    Warbroek, Beau
    Lammers, Imke
    Lepping, Isabella
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (02) : 1900 - 1931
  • [2] The Integration of Best Environmental Management Practices in Corporate Strategy: Empirical Evidence From Italian Local Governments
    Angiola, Nunzio
    Bianchi, Piervito
    Corvino, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 38 (07) : 510 - 520
  • [3] Best Practices for Local Sections
    Sniegowski, Kara
    TRIBOLOGY & LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 68 (04) : 18 - 22
  • [4] Best practices in e-government communication: Lessons from the local Governments' use of official facebook pages
    Bangero, Hyacinth Balediata
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2025, 42 (01)
  • [5] Local governments and sustainable development: Nurturing best practices through horizontal learning process (HLP) across countries
    Lahiri, Santanu
    Rajan, J. B.
    TEACHING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 40 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [6] Local governments and sustainable development: Nurturing best practices through Horizontal Learning Process (HLP) across countries
    Lahiri, Santanu
    Rajan, J. B.
    TEACHING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 40 (02) : 145 - 166
  • [7] Adoption of Sun Safe Workplace Practices by Local Governments
    Wallis, Allan
    Andersen, Peter A.
    Buller, David B.
    Walkosz, Barbara
    Lui, Lucia
    Buller, Mary
    Scott, Michael D.
    Jenkins, Rob
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (06): : 608 - 616
  • [8] For the People: Popular Financial Reporting Practices of Local Governments
    Yusuf, Juita-Elena
    Jordan, Meagan
    Neill, Katharine
    Hackbart, Merl
    PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE, 2013, 33 (01): : 95 - 113
  • [9] Growth management and historic preservation: Best practices for synthesis
    Listokin, D
    URBAN LAWYER, 1997, 29 (02): : 199 - 213
  • [10] Managing Performance and Strategy: Managerial Practices in German Local Governments
    Weiss, Jens
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 43 (05) : 1129 - 1149