Methane emissions from sugarcane vinasse storage and transportation systems: Comparison between open channels and tanks

被引:20
|
作者
Oliveira, Bruna Goncalves [1 ]
Nunes Carvalho, Joao Luis [2 ]
Chagas, Mateus Ferreira [2 ]
Pellegrino Cerri, Carlos Eduardo [3 ]
Cerri, Carlos Clemente [1 ]
Feigl, Brigitte Josefine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Nucl Energy Agr, Av Centenario 303, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Brazilian Ctr Res Energy & Mat CNPEM, Brazilian Bioethanol Sci & Technol Lab CTBE, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Av Padua Dias 11, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Greenhouse gas emission; Effluents; Methanogenesis; Sedimentation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; GHG EMISSIONS; GAS EMISSIONS; ETHANOL; IMPACTS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; REDUCTION; LAGOONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the last few years the brazilian sugarcane sector has produced an average of 23.5 million liters of ethanol annually. This scale of production generates large amounts of vinasse, which depending on the manner that is disposed, can result significant greenhouse gas emissions. This study aimed to quantify the methane (CH4) emissions associated with the two most widespread systems of vinasse storage and transportation used in Brazil; open channel and those comprising of tanks and pipes. Additionally, a laboratory incubation study was performed with the aim of isolating the effects of vinasse, sediment and the interaction between these factors on CH4 emissions. We observed significant differences in CH4 emissions between the sampling points along the channels during both years of evaluation (2012-2013). In the channel system, around 80% of CH4 emissions were recorded from uncoated sections. Overall, the average CH4 emission intensity was 1.36 kg CO(2)eq m(-3) of vinasse transported in open channels, which was 620 times higher than vinasse transported through a system of tanks and closed pipes. The laboratory incubation corroborated field results, suggesting that vinasse alone does not contribute significant emissions of CH4. Higher CH4 emissions were observed when vinasse and sediment were incubated together. In summary, our findings demonstrate that CH4 emissions originate through the anaerobic decomposition of organic material deposited on the bottom of channels and tanks. The adoption of coated channels as a substitute to uncoated channels offers the potential for an effective and affordable means of reducing CH4 emissions. Ultimately, the modernization of vinasse storage and transportation systems through the adoption of tank and closed pipe systems will provide an effective strategy for mitigating CH4 emissions generated during the disposal phase of the sugarcane ethanol production process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 146
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane vinasse transportation by open channel: a case study in Brazil
    de Oliveira, Bruna Goncalves
    Nunes Carvalho, Joao Luis
    Pellegrino Cerri, Carlos Eduardo
    Cerri, Carlos Clemente
    Feigl, Brigitte Josefine
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 : 102 - 107
  • [2] Assessment of microbial diversity associated with CH4 emission from sugarcane vinasse storage and transportation systems
    Oliveira, Bruna G.
    Mendes, Lucas W.
    Smyth, Eoghan M.
    Tsai, Siu M.
    Feigl, Brigitte J.
    Mackie, Roderick, I
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 269
  • [3] Methane emissions from aboveground open manure slurry tanks
    Kaharabata, SK
    Schuepp, PH
    Desjardins, RL
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1998, 12 (03) : 545 - 554
  • [4] Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
    Johnson, Derek
    Clark, Nigel
    Heltzel, Robert
    Darzi, Mahdi
    Footer, Tracey L.
    Herndon, Scott
    Thoma, Eben D.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT-X, 2022, 16
  • [5] Quantification of methane emissions from latrines, septic tanks, and stagnant, open sewers in the world
    Doorn, M
    Liles, D
    Thorneloe, S
    NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES: SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION, 2000, : 83 - 88
  • [6] A comparison of systems for measuring methane emissions from sheep
    Murray, PJ
    Moss, A
    Lockyer, DR
    Jarvis, SC
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1999, 133 : 439 - 444
  • [7] Methane emissions from Icelandic landfills – A comparison between measured and modelled emissions
    Scheutz, C.
    Kjeld, A.
    Fredenslund, A.M.
    Waste Management, 2022, 139 : 136 - 145
  • [8] Methane emissions from Icelandic landfills - A comparison between measured and modelled emissions
    Scheutz, C.
    Kjeld, A.
    Fredenslund, A. M.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 139 : 136 - 145
  • [9] Evaluation of methane emissions from Palermo municipal landfill: Comparison between field measurements and models
    Di Bella, Gaetano
    Di Trapani, Daniele
    Viviani, Gaspare
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (08) : 1820 - 1826
  • [10] Thermoeconomic analysis of storage systems for solar heating and cooling systems: A comparison between variable-volume and fixed-volume tanks
    Buonomano, Annamaria
    Calise, Francesco
    Ferruzzi, Gabriele
    ENERGY, 2013, 59 : 600 - 616