A theoretical model of bank lending: Does ownership matter in times of crisis?

被引:51
|
作者
Brei, Michael [1 ,4 ]
Schclarek, Alfredo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Ouest, EconomiX CNRS, Nanterre, France
[2] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Dept Econ, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[3] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ W Indies, SALISES, Kingston, Trinidad Tobago
关键词
Financial crisis; Bank lending; Public banks; Bank runs; Monetary policy; GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP; DEPOSIT INSURANCE; FINANCIAL CRISIS; LIQUIDITY; CREDIT; CHOICE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.038
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The present study investigates theoretically the lending responses of government-owned and private banks in the event of unexpected financial shocks. Our model predicts that public banks provide more loans to the real sector during times of crisis, compared to private banks which cut down on lending and increase liquidity holdings. We put forth three reasons for this heterogeneous behavior. First, the objective of public banks, in contrast to their private peers, is not only to maximize profits given risks, but also to stabilize and promote the recovery of the economy. Second, public banks may suffer less deposit withdrawals or avoid a bank run in a severe crisis, because the state has better access to additional funds making a recapitalization more likely. And finally, public banks may suffer less deposit withdrawals due to their higher credibility in promising a future recapitalization in the case of a severe crisis. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 307
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条