Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the little river watershed

被引:1
|
作者
Feyereisen, G. W.
Strickland, T. C.
Bosch, D. D.
Sullivan, D. G.
机构
[1] USDA ARS, PSWMRU, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] USDA ARS, SE Watershed Res Lab, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
关键词
calibration; hydrologic modeling; sensitivity; streamflow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The watershed-scale effects of agricultural conservation practices are not well understood. A baseline calibration and an input parameter sensitivity analysis were conducted for simulation of watershed-scale hydrology in the Little River Experimental Watershed (LREW) in the Coastal Plain near Tifton, Georgia. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was manually calibrated to simulate the hydrologic budget components measured for the 16.9 km(2) subwatershed K of the LREW from 1995 to 2004. A local sensitivity analysis was performed on 16 input variables. The sum of squares of the differences between observed and simulated annual averages for baseflow, stormflow, evapotranspiration, and deep percolation was 19 mm(2); average annual precipitation was 1136 mm. The monthly Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) for total water yield (TWYLD) was 0.79 for the ten-year period. Daily NSE for TWYLD was 0.42. The monthly NSE for three years with above-average rainfall was 0.89, while monthly NSE was 0.59 for seven years with below annual average rainfall, indicating that SWAT's predictive capabilities are less well-suited for drier conditions. Monthly average TWYLD for the high flow winter to early spring season was underpredicted, while the low flow late summer to autumn TWYLD was overpredicted. Results were negatively influenced when seasonal tropical storms occurred during a dry year. The most sensitive parameters for TWYLD were curve number for crop land (CN2(crop)), soil available water content (SOL_AWC), and soil evaporation compensation factor (ESCO). The most sensitive parameters for stormflow were CN2(crop), curve number for forested land (CN2(forest)), soil bulk density (SOL_BD), and SOL_AWC. The most sensitive parameters for baseflow were CN2(crop), CN2(forest), ESCO, and SOL_AWC. Identification of the sensitive SWAT parameters in the LREW provides modelers in the Coastal Plain physiographic region with focus for SWAT calibration.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 855
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Calibration and validation of SWAT for the upper maquoketa river watershed
    Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Int Agric Eng J, 2007, 1-2 (35-48):
  • [2] SWAT manual calibration and parameters sensitivity analysis in a semi-arid watershed in North-western Morocco
    Brouziyne, Youssef
    Abouabdillah, Aziz
    Bouabid, Rachid
    Benaabidate, Lahcen
    Oueslati, Ons
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (19)
  • [3] SWAT manual calibration and parameters sensitivity analysis in a semi-arid watershed in North-western Morocco
    Youssef Brouziyne
    Aziz Abouabdillah
    Rachid Bouabid
    Lahcen Benaabidate
    Ons Oueslati
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10
  • [4] Hydrologic simulation of the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed using SWAT
    Van Liew, MW
    Garbrecht, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2003, 39 (02): : 413 - 426
  • [5] Integrating Integrating Manual Calibration and Auto-Calibration of SWAT Model in Muar Watershed, Johor
    Rusli, Noradila
    Majid, M. Rafee
    Yusop, Zulkifli
    Tan, Mou Leong
    Hashim, Suhaila
    Bohari, Sharifah Norashikin
    2016 7TH IEEE CONTROL AND SYSTEM GRADUATE RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM (ICSGRC), 2016, : 197 - 202
  • [6] IMPROVING DAILY WATER YIELD ESTIMATES IN THE LITTLE RIVER WATERSHED: SWAT ADJUSTMENTS
    White, E. D.
    Feyereisen, G. W.
    Veith, T. L.
    Bosch, D. D.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2009, 52 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [7] A Comparison of SWAT Model Calibration Techniques for Hydrological Modeling in the Ganga River Watershed
    Shivhare, Nikita
    Dikshit, Prabhat Kumar Singh
    Dwivedi, Shyam Bihari
    ENGINEERING, 2018, 4 (05) : 643 - 652
  • [8] Assessment of Riparian Buffer Impacts within the Little River Watershed in Georgia USA with the SWAT Model
    Bosch, D. D.
    Cho, J.
    Lowrance, R. R.
    Vellidis, G.
    Strickland, T. C.
    21ST CENTURY WATERSHED TECHNOLOGY: IMPROVING WATER QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2010,
  • [9] Time domain reflectometry field calibration in the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed
    Heathman, GC
    Starks, PJ
    Brown, MA
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2003, 67 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [10] Assessing SWAT's performance in the Kaskaskia River watershed as influenced by the number of calibration stations used
    Chiang, Li-Chi
    Yuan, Yongping
    Mehaffey, Megan
    Jackson, Michael
    Chaubey, Indrajeet
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (03) : 676 - 687