Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Brian [1 ]
Breau, Rodney H. [1 ]
Papadatos, Demetri [2 ]
Fergusson, Dean [3 ]
Doucette, Steve [3 ]
Cagiannos, Ilias [1 ]
Morash, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2010年 / 4卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; PELVIC LYMPH-NODES; PHASED-ARRAY COIL; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INCREMENTAL VALUE; CLINICAL STAGE; NOMOGRAM; CARCINOMA; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.09103
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Preoperative prostate cancer stage predicts prognosis and affects treatment decisions. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer stage using surgical pathologic data as the reference standard. Methods: High-risk patients (>= cT3 or PSA >= 20 ng/mL or Gleason >= 8) and selected intermediate-risk patients (clinically bulky disease on exam or biopsy, cT2b/c, or Gleason 7 with >= 3 of 5 biopsy cores positive in a lobe) routinely received a pelvic MRI at our institution. The images of identified patients were reviewed by one radiologist who was blinded to clinical information. The radiologist reported presence or absence of tumour within each lobe of the prostate. Extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle (SV) invasion and pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis were also reported. Radiological findings were compared with prostatectomy pathology reports. Results: During the study period, about 320 radical prostatectomies were performed. Of these, 32 had a preoperative surface coil pelvic MRI adequate for analysis. Pathologically, 53 of 64 (82.8%) prostate lobes contained tumour, 17 (26.6%) lobes had associated EPE, 12 (18.8%) had SV involvement and 7 (10.9%) sets of PLNs contained cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 94.3% and 81.8% for tumour location, 82.4% and 87.2% for EPE, 83.3% and 92.3% for SV invasion and 71.4% and 94.7% fer PLN involvement. Interpretation: Surface coil MRI accurately stages many prostate cancer patients with elevated risk of extraprostatic disease. This mode of imaging may be reasonable at centres that do not have endorectal coil MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (02) : 233 - 245
  • [2] USE OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    CHELSKY, MJ
    SCHNALL, MD
    SEIDMON, EJ
    POLLACK, HM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02): : 391 - 395
  • [3] EXTERNAL SURFACE COIL AND ENDORECTAL COIL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING: WHICH IS MORE ACCURATE FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE CANCER?
    Kim, B. S.
    Yoo, E. S.
    Kang, K. M.
    Kim, T. H.
    Chung, S. K.
    Park, Y. K.
    Kwon, T. G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 232 - 232
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for local staging of prostate cancer in a multicenter setting
    Oudshoorn F.H.K.
    Jansen B.H.E.
    Tijans A.M.
    Yska M.
    Lont A.P.
    Collette E.R.P.
    Klaver S.
    Vis A.N.
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2018, 8 (5) : 76 - 80
  • [5] Influence of Varying Assessment Parameters on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Local Staging of Prostate Cancer
    Umbehr, Martin H.
    Luescher, Martin
    Hunziker, Roger
    Falkner, Florian
    Wilde, Peter J.
    Poyet, Cedric
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Muentener, Michael
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (03) : 309 - 314
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lin, Yue
    Johnson, Latrice A.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [7] Local staging and assessment of colon cancer with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging
    Hunter, Chris
    Blake, Helena
    Jeyadevan, Nelesh
    Abulafi, Muti
    Swift, Ian
    Toomey, Paul
    Brown, Gina
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1064):
  • [8] Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer
    Zhu, Junming
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Xue, Yuting
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zheng, Qingshui
    Xue, Xueyi
    Huang, Zhiyang
    Chen, Shaohao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (04) : 1024 - 1030
  • [9] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [10] PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    JAGER, GJ
    BARENTSZ, JO
    DELAROSETTE, JJMCH
    ROSENBUSCH, G
    RADIOLOGE, 1994, 34 (03): : 129 - 133