Radium isotope response to aquifer storage and recovery in a sandstone aquifer

被引:5
|
作者
Vinson, David S. [1 ]
Lundy, James R. [2 ]
Dwyer, Gary S. [3 ]
Vengosh, Avner [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, 9201 Univ City Blvd,324 McEniry, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Minnesota Dept Hlth, Div Environm Hlth, 625 North Robert St, St Paul, MN 55164 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Radium; Strontium; Isotopes; Aquifer storage and recovery; Sandstone; TH-SERIES NUCLIDES; DRINKING-WATER; RECLAIMED WATER; COASTAL WATERS; GROUND WATERS; U-SERIES; USA; RETARDATION; ADSORPTION; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.01.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Radium isotopes and water-rock interaction were evaluated in an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) pilot study conducted in 2010-2011 in Minnesota (USA) in order to identify mechanisms governing Ra activities when low-Ra water is recharged into a sandstone aquifer. Groundwater in the aquifer selected for the study, the Cambrian Mt. Simon Sandstone, contains naturally occurring radium that in many areas exceeds United States drinking water standards (185 mBq/L or 5 pCi/L combined Ra-226+Ra-228), highlighting the need to identify the rates and mechanisms by which stored water acquires Ra isotopes. Major element concentrations of recovered water largely resembled recharged water, while Ra activities exceeded the Ra activities of the recharged water. Ra-224 reached similar to 100 mBq/L during the first 8 h of recovery (overall range 15.5-133 mBq/L). Ra-226 and Ra-228 also increased during the 47-day recovery period (23.7-82.5 mBq/L and 33.7-85.5 mBq/L, respectively). Ra isotope ratios indicate the relative contribution of alpha recoil vs. chemical processes (e.g. adsorption/desorption). During recovery, the Ra-224/Ra-228 and Ra-228/Ra-226 ratios declined, approaching their expected limiting values near unity. Collectively, the rates of Ra activity change with time, trends in Ra isotope ratios, barium concentrations, and manganese concentrations suggest that Ra was governed by chemical processes and alpha recoil, in which the half-lives of each Ra isotope determined the primary mechanism(s) controlling radionuclide mobilization from the aquifer solids. Radium-mobilizing processes during storage may include: (1) recharge of low-Ra water into an aquifer containing high-Ra groundwater induced adsorption/desorption disequilibrium and caused net Ra desorption; (2) chemical conditions during storage (e.g. the Ba content of the recharge water or the reducing conditions in the aquifer) could have further released Ra from the aquifer solids or reduced the effectiveness of Ra adsorption; and/or (3) mobilization from radioactive decay of solid-phase thorium parents (alpha recoil) contributed Ra isotopes into the low-Ra recharge water. The short-lived Ra-224 was released dominantly by alpha recoil while the longer-lived Ra-226 was dominantly released by chemical mechanisms such as desorption. Radium-228, of intermediate half-life, also appears to have been released predominantly by alpha recoil, although significant chemical release of Ra-228 cannot be ruled out. Accordingly, at near-neutral pH, groundwater geochemical conditions (such as redox state and/or shifts in Ra activities or Ba concentrations) can influence observed Ra activities in recovered water, which in proportional terms impart the largest effect on the longer-lived Ra-226. Given the roles for both alpha recoil and chemical reactions, the duration of storage could influence radium activities in recovered water from ASR wells.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aquifer Storage and Recovery
    Pillar, T.
    Water, 24 (01):
  • [2] Geochemical factors controlling radium activity in a sandstone aquifer
    Grundl, Tim
    Cape, Mike
    GROUND WATER, 2006, 44 (04) : 518 - 527
  • [3] Denitrification in a Deep Basalt Aquifer: Implications for Aquifer Storage and Recovery
    Nelson, Dennis
    Melady, Jason
    GROUNDWATER, 2014, 52 (03) : 414 - 423
  • [4] Study of the feasibility of an aquifer storage and recovery system in a deep aquifer in Belgium
    Vandenbohede, Alexander
    Van Houtte, Emmanuel
    Lebbe, Luc
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2008, 53 (04): : 844 - 856
  • [5] Hydraulic Fracturing of the Floridan Aquifer from Aquifer Storage and Recovery Operations
    Geibel, Nicholas M.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING GEOSCIENCE, 2012, 18 (02): : 175 - 189
  • [6] Aquifer storage and recovery: a feasibility study
    Wakker, JC
    Castenmiller, EJC
    Beckers, RJSM
    IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY ON GROUNDWATER DYNAMICS, 2001, (269): : 291 - 295
  • [7] Aquifer storage and recovery: A feasibility study
    Wakker, J.C.
    Castenmiller, E.J.C.
    Beckers, R.J.S.M.
    IAHS-AISH Publication, 2001, (269): : 291 - 296
  • [8] Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) of chlorinated municipal drinking water in a confined aquifer
    Izbicki, John A.
    Petersen, Christen E.
    Glotzbach, Kenneth J.
    Metzger, Loren F.
    Christensen, Allen H.
    Smith, Gregory A.
    O'Leary, David
    Fram, Miranda S.
    Joseph, Trevor
    Shannon, Heather
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 25 (08) : 1133 - 1152
  • [9] Arsenic Control During Aquifer Storage Recovery Cycle Tests in the Floridan Aquifer
    Mirecki, June E.
    Bennett, Michael W.
    Lopez-Balaez, Marie C.
    GROUND WATER, 2013, 51 (04) : 539 - 549
  • [10] Nutrient Removal during Stormwater Aquifer Storage and Recovery in an Anoxic Carbonate Aquifer
    Vanderzalm, Joanne L.
    Page, Declan W.
    Dillon, Peter J.
    Barry, Karen E.
    Gonzalez, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (02) : 276 - 286