State expenditures and policy outcomes in environmental program management

被引:40
作者
Bacot, AH [1 ]
Dawes, RA
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Gettysburg Coll, Gettysburg, PA 17325 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00027.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Comparative state environmental research seeks to explain the factors contributing to intergovernmental environmental management. In pursuing the answer to this query, researchers have relied on either fiscal (expenditures) or nonfiscal (ranking) measures of stare environmental effort. Respecting the debate surrounding state policy outputs and fiscal versus nonfiscal measures, we evaluate comprehensive state environmental management comparing spending and ranking measures in our analysis. Though pronounced differences do exist between the two models, we find pollution and state size to be the primary factors affecting a state's environmental effort no matter which measure is used.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 370
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
*ADV COMM INT REL, 1988, SIGN FEAT FISC FED
[2]  
*ADV COMM INT REL, 1984, REG FED POL PROC IMP
[3]  
[Anonymous], STATE LOCAL GOVT REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
Bacot A. H., 1996, STATE LOCAL GOVT REV, V28, P124
[6]   STATE LOTTERY ADOPTIONS AS POLICY INNOVATIONS - AN EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS [J].
BERRY, FS ;
BERRY, WD .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1990, 84 (02) :395-415
[7]  
BOSSO CJ, 1994, ENV POLICY 1990S, P31
[8]  
BOWMAN AO, 1986, RESURGENCE STATES
[9]  
BROWN R, 1988, RESOURCE GUIDE STATE
[10]  
CALVERT JW, 1989, ENV POLITICS POLICY, P158