Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant

被引:27
|
作者
Athari, Hassan [1 ]
Soltani, Saeed [2 ]
Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed [2 ]
Rosen, Marc A. [3 ]
Morosuk, Tatiana [4 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Univ Tabriz, Fac Mech Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Biomass; Gasifier; Combined-cycle power plant; Energy analysis; Exergy analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSES; NATURAL-GAS; GASIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.033
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass can be converted thermo- and bio-chemically to solid, liquid and gaseous biofuels. In this paper, energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses are applied to a biomass integrated post-firing combined-cycle power plant. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the cycle are found to be maximized at specific compressor pressure ratio values, and that higher pressure ratios reduce the total unit product cost Increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature and decreasing the compressor pressure ratio decreases the CO2 mole fraction exiting the power plant. The exergoeconomic factor for the biomass integrated post-firing combined-cycle power plant at the optimum energy/exergy efficiency is 0.39. This implies that the major cost rate of this power plant configuration is attributable to the exergy destruction cost rate. Increasing the compressor pressure ratio decreases the mass of air per mass of steam in the power plant, implying a reduction in the gas turbine plant size. Increasing both the compressor pressure ratio and the heat recovery steam generator inlet gas temperature increases the capital investment cost compared with the exergy destruction cost However, increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature decreases this ratio. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 561
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative exergoeconomic evaluation of biomass post-firing and co-firing combined power plants
    Athari, Hassan
    Soltani, Saeed
    Rosen, Marc A.
    Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed
    Morosuk, Tatiana
    BIOFUELS-UK, 2017, 8 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [2] Combined-cycle: Combined-cycle power plant trends
    Diesel & Gas Turbine Worldwide, 2000, 32 (06):
  • [3] Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Two-Pressure Level Fired Combined-Cycle Power Plant
    Khanmohammadi, Shoaib
    Azimian, Ahmad Reza
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (03)
  • [4] Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a combined-cycle power plant
    Shin, JY
    Jeon, YJ
    Maeng, DJ
    Kim, JS
    Ro, ST
    ENERGY, 2002, 27 (12) : 1085 - 1098
  • [5] Fuzzy logic control of a combined-cycle power plant using biomass
    Jurado, F
    Cano, A
    ENERGY SOURCES, 2003, 25 (02): : 113 - 121
  • [6] Exergoeconomic modeling and evaluation of a combined-cycle plant with MSF and MED desalination
    Manesh, M. H. Khoshgoftar
    Kabiri, S.
    Yazdi, M.
    Petrakopoulou, F.
    JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION, 2020, 10 (02): : 158 - 172
  • [7] Comparative exergoeconomic evaluation of the latest generation of combined-cycle power plants
    Blumberg, Timo
    Assar, Marwan
    Morosuk, Tatiana
    Tsatsaronis, George
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 153 : 616 - 626
  • [8] Conventional and enhanced thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses of a photovoltaic combined cycle with biomass post firing and hydrogen production
    Moharramian, Anahita
    Soltani, Saeed
    Rosen, Marc A.
    Mahmoudi, S. M. S.
    Jafari, Moharram
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 160
  • [9] PROBABILISTIC OUTAGE ANALYSIS OF A COMBINED-CYCLE POWER-PLANT
    KIRCHSTEIGER, C
    TEICHMANN, J
    BALLING, L
    POWER ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1995, 9 (03): : 137 - 141
  • [10] A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants
    Soltani, S.
    Mahmoudi, S. M. S.
    Yari, M.
    Morosuk, T.
    Rosen, M. A.
    Zare, V.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 76 : 83 - 91