共 50 条
Interobserver agreement for EUS findings in familial pancreatic-cancer kindreds
被引:77
|作者:
Topazian, Mark
Enders, Felicity
Kimmey, Michael
Brand, Randall
Chak, Amitabh
Clain, Jonathan
Cunningham, John
Eloubeidi, Mohamad
Gerdes, Hans
Gress, Frank
Jagannath, Sanjay
Kantsevoy, Sergey
LeBlanc, Julia Kim
Levy, Michael
Lightdale, Charles
Romagnuolo, Joseph
Saltzman, John R.
Savides, Thomas
Wiersema, Maurits
Woodward, Timothy
Petersen, Gloria
Canto, Marcia
机构:
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Glenview, IL USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Hlth Sci Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[7] Cornell Univ, Mem Hosp Canc & Allied Dis, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Indianapolis, IN USA
[10] Indiana Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[11] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[12] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[13] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[14] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[15] Indiana Med Associates, Ft Wayne, IN USA
[16] Mayo Clin, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1016/j.gie.2006.09.018
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: EUS is a promising modality for pancreatic-cancer screening in high-risk persons, including familial pancreatic-cancer (FPC) kindreds. Objective: To assess interobserver agreement for interpretation of EUS in persons at high risk for pancreatic cancer. Design: Seventeen expert endosonographers blinded to patients' clinical history rated a "training set" of pancreatic EUS video clips for the presence of a normal examination, masses, cysts, and features of chronic pancreatitis. Clips included high-risk persons and controls (normal and various pancreatic diseases). The endosonographers then participated in a workshop on EUS findings in high-risk persons and drafted a consensus statement. Three months later, they blindly rated a "test set" composed of the same video clips. Main Outcome Measurements: Interobserver agreement at baseline (training set) and after a consensus process (test set). Results: For the training set, interobserver agreement was good (kappa >= 0.4) for the presence of cysts and was fair to poor for all other rated EUS features and diagnosis of normal. There was no overall improvement in the test set. in both the training and test sets, agreement was worse for clips from FPC kindreds (kappa >= 0.4 for cysts and < 0.4 for all other features) than for controls (kappa >= 0.4 for normal, cysts, masses, echogenic strands, and lobularity). Limitations: Video clips were not of identical image quality and duration as a clinical EUS examination. Conclusions: There was fair to poor interobserver agreement for the interpretation of pancreatic EUS video clips from members of FPC kindreds. Agreement was not improved by a consensus process.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 67
页数:6
相关论文