Evolution in stressful environments II:: adaptive value and costs of plasticity in response to low light in Sinapis arvensis

被引:144
|
作者
Steinger, T
Roy, BA
Stanton, ML
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol ETHZ, Geobot Inst, Dept Environm Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Populat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
adaptation; genetic variation; life-history; phenotypic plasticity; plasticity cost; selection; specific leaf area; stress;
D O I
10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00518.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Plants possess a remarkable capacity to alter their phenotype in response to the highly heterogeneous light conditions they commonly encounter in natural environments. In the present study with the weedy annual plant Sinapis arvensis, we (a) tested for the adaptive value of phenotypic plasticity in morphological and life history traits in response to low light and (b) explored possible fitness costs of plasticity. Replicates of 31 half-sib families were grown individually in the greenhouse under full light and under low light (40% of ambient) imposed by neutral shade cloth. Low light resulted in a large increase in hypocotyl length and specific leaf area (SLA), a reduction in juvenile biomass and a delayed onset of flowering. Phenotypic selection analysis within each light environment revealed that selection favoured large SLA under low light, but not under high light, suggesting that the observed increase in SLA was adaptive. In contrast, plasticity in the other traits measured was maladaptive (i.e. in the opposite direction to that favoured by selection in the low light environment). We detected significant additive genetic variance in plasticity in most phenotypic traits and in fitness (number of seeds). Using genotypic selection gradient analysis, we found that families with high plasticity in SLA had a lower fitness than families with low plasticity, when the effect of SLA on fitness was statistically kept constant. This indicates that plasticity in SLA incurred a direct fitness cost. However, a cost of plasticity was only expressed under low light, but not under high light. Thus, models on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity will need to incorporate plasticity costs that vary in magnitude depending on environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 323
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana:: Testing for adaptive value and costs
    Dorn, LA
    Pyle, EH
    Schmitt, J
    EVOLUTION, 2000, 54 (06) : 1982 - 1994
  • [2] Rapid evolution in response to introduced predators II: the contribution of adaptive plasticity
    Latta, Leigh C.
    Bakelar, Jeremy W.
    Knapp, Roland A.
    Pfrender, Michael E.
    BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [3] Rapid evolution in response to introduced predators II: the contribution of adaptive plasticity
    Leigh C Latta
    Jeremy W Bakelar
    Roland A Knapp
    Michael E Pfrender
    BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7
  • [4] The role of heterotrophic plasticity in coral response to natural low-light environments
    Luo, Yong
    Yu, Xiaolei
    Huang, Lintao
    Gan, Jianfeng
    Lei, Xinming
    Jiang, Lei
    Liu, Chengyue
    Sun, Youfang
    Cheng, Meng
    Zhang, Yuyang
    Zhou, Guowei
    Liu, Sheng
    Lian, Jiansheng
    Huang, Hui
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [5] CHANGES IN THE STOICHIOMETRY OF PHOTOSYSTEM-II COMPONENTS AS AN ADAPTIVE RESPONSE TO HIGHLIGHT AND LOW-LIGHT CONDITIONS DURING GROWTH
    WILD, A
    HOPFNER, M
    RUHLE, W
    RICHTER, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG SECTION C-A JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 1986, 41 (5-6): : 597 - 603