Providing Quantitative Information and a Nudge to Undergo Stool Testing in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:23
|
作者
Schwartz, Peter H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Perkins, Susan M. [4 ,5 ]
Schmidt, Karen K. [1 ]
Muriello, Paul F. [1 ,2 ]
Althouse, Sandra [5 ]
Rawl, Susan M. [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Ctr Bioeth, 410 W 10th St,Ste 3100, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Liberal Arts, Dept Philosophy, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Simon Canc Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
关键词
Decision aids; colorectal cancer screening; risk communication; behavioral economics; numeracy; SUPPORT INFORMED CHOICES; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; RISK COMMUNICATION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; NUMBERS MATTER; NUMERACY; PREFERENCES; COLONOSCOPY; MODELS; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X17698678
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Guidelines recommend that patient decision aids should provide quantitative information about probabilities of potential outcomes, but the impact of this information is unknown. Behavioral economics suggests that patients confused by quantitative information could benefit from a nudge towards one option. We conducted a pilot randomized trial to estimate the effect sizes of presenting quantitative information and a nudge. Methods. Primary care patients (n = 213) eligible for colorectal cancer screening viewed basic screening information and were randomized to view (a) quantitative information (quantitative module), (b) a nudge towards stool testing with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (nudge module), (c) neither a nor b, or (d) both a and b. Outcome measures were perceived colorectal cancer risk, screening intent, preferred test, and decision conflict, measured before and after viewing the decision aid, and screening behavior at 6 months. Results. Patients viewing the quantitative module were more likely to be screened than those who did not (P = 0.012). Patients viewing the nudge module had a greater increase in perceived colorectal cancer risk than those who did not (P = 0.041). Those viewing the quantitative module had a smaller increase in perceived risk than those who did not (P = 0.046), and the effect was moderated by numeracy. Among patients with high numeracy who did not view the nudge module, those who viewed the quantitative module had a greater increase in intent to undergo FIT (P = 0.028) than did those who did not. Limitations. The limitations of this study were the limited sample size and single healthcare system. Conclusions. Adding quantitative information to a decision aid increased uptake of colorectal cancer screening, while adding a nudge to undergo FIT did not increase uptake. Further research on quantitative information in decision aids is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 702
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of including quantitative information in a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Perkins, Susan M.
    Schmidt, Karen K.
    Althouse, Sandra
    Rawl, Susan M.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (04) : 726 - 734
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening
    Dolan, JG
    Frisina, S
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (02) : 125 - 139
  • [3] Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial
    Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
    Amado Rivero-Santana
    Alezandra Torres-Castaño
    Vanesa Ramos-Garcia
    Yolanda Alvarez-Perez
    Nerea Gonzalez-Hernandez
    Andrea Buron
    Michael Pignone
    Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19
  • [4] Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Rivero-Santana, Amado
    Torres-Castano, Alezandra
    Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa
    Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda
    Gonzalez-Hernandez, Nerea
    Buron, Andrea
    Pignone, Michael
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [5] Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening
    Trevena, Lyndal J.
    Irwig, Les
    Barratt, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2008, 15 (02) : 76 - 82
  • [6] Aid-Assisted Decision Making and Colorectal Cancer Screening A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    Emmons, Karen M.
    Peters, Ellen
    Glick, Julie T.
    Robinson, Patricia A.
    Lydotes, Maria A.
    Mylvaganam, Shamini R.
    Coe, Alison M.
    Chen, Clara A.
    Chaisson, Christine E.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Prout, Marianne N.
    Davidson, Peter K.
    Heeren, Timothy C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 43 (06) : 573 - 583
  • [7] A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial
    Carmen L Lewis
    Carol E Golin
    Chris DeLeon
    Jennifer M Griffith
    Jena Ivey
    Lyndal Trevena
    Michael Pignone
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10
  • [8] A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    Golin, Carol E.
    DeLeon, Chris
    Griffith, Jennifer M.
    Ivey, Jena
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Pignone, Michael
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2010, 10
  • [9] Design of a randomized clinical trial of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid to promote appropriate screening in community-dwelling older adults
    Kistler, Christine E.
    Golin, Carol
    Morris, Carolyn
    Dalton, Alexandra F.
    Harris, Russell P.
    Dolor, Rowena
    Ferrari, Renee M.
    Brewer, Noel T.
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (06) : 648 - 658
  • [10] Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Adults A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Dalton, Alexandra F.
    Golin, Carol E.
    Morris, Carolyn
    Kistler, Christine E.
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Bertin, Kaitlyn B.
    Suresh, Krithika
    Patel, Swati G.
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12) : e2244982