Compelling evidence: an influence on middle school students' accounts that may impact decision-making about socioscientific issues

被引:8
|
作者
Emery, Katherine [1 ]
Harlow, Danielle [2 ]
Whitmer, Ali [3 ]
Gaines, Steven [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Marine Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Gevirtz Grad Sch Educ, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Off Provost, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Environmental education; decision-making; environmental issues; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; SCIENCE; ARGUMENTATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2016.1225673
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates how middle school students make hypothetical purchasing, consuming, and voting decisions about environmental and science-related issues - a key component of environmental literacy. Fifty-three female students were given a packet containing multiple excerpts of information from conflicting positions from stakeholders and interviewed about how they would make decisions about environmental and science-related issues. We first investigated whether and how information presented as evidence influenced students' accounts that may impact their decision-making (i.e. to make or change decisions). We then investigated how evidence type affected students' decision-making. Findings indicated that most students did not change their stance after reading additional contrasting information presented as evidence. Implications for science teaching and learning are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1129
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The effects of a collaborative argumentation intervention on Chinese students' socioscientific issues decision-making
    Zhu, Yucheng
    He, Aiwen
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 115 (06): : 317 - 332
  • [2] USE OF EVOLUTIONARY KNOWLEDGE IN THE DECISION-MAKING OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS ON SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
    Conrado, Dalia Melissa
    Leal, Felipe Braga
    de Carvalho, Italo Nascimento
    Cruz, Leonidia Maria S.
    de Souza, Maira Miele O. R.
    de Almeida, Tiago P.
    Moura, Uelen O.
    Sepulveda, Claudia
    El-Hani, Charbel N.
    REVISTA CONTEMPORANEA DE EDUCACAO, 2012, 7 (14): : 345 - 368
  • [3] Teachers' Decision-Making about Teaching Novels in Middle School
    Martinez, Miriam
    Harmon, Janis
    Gonzales, Jessica
    Wilburn, Marcy
    READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 42 (08) : 873 - 898
  • [4] Preservice biology teachers' decision-making and informal reasoning about culture-based socioscientific issues
    Ladachart, Luecha
    Ladachart, Ladapa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2021, 43 (05) : 641 - 671
  • [5] Students' Use of Decision-Making Strategies With Regard to Socioscientific Issues: An Application of the Rasch Partial Credit Model
    Eggert, Sabina
    Boegeholz, Susanne
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, 94 (02) : 230 - 258
  • [6] Students' Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues-Development of a measurement instrument
    Sakschewski, Mark
    Eggert, Sabina
    Schneider, Susanne
    Boegeholz, Susanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 36 (14) : 2291 - 2313
  • [7] The Effect of Argumentation on Middle School Students' Scientific Literacy as well as their Views, Attitudes and Knowledge About Socioscientific Issues
    Turk, Cansu Karaman
    Cam, Aylin
    SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [8] Using Social Network Graphs as Visualization Tools to Influence Peer Selection Decision-Making Strategies to Access Information About Complex Socioscientific Issues
    Yoon, Susan A.
    JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2011, 20 (04) : 549 - 588
  • [9] DO CHILDBIRTH CLASSES INFLUENCE DECISION-MAKING ABOUT LABOR AND POSTPARTUM ISSUES
    HANDFIELD, B
    BELL, R
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1995, 22 (03): : 153 - 160
  • [10] A typology of situational factors: Impact on salesperson decision-making about ethical issues
    Ross, WT
    Robertson, DC
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 46 (03) : 213 - 234