Energetic reasoning and mixed-integer linear programming for scheduling with a continuous resource and linear efficiency functions

被引:10
|
作者
Nattaf, Margaux [1 ,2 ]
Artigues, Christian [1 ,3 ]
Lopez, Pierre [1 ,3 ]
Rivreau, David [4 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, LAAS, 7 Ave Colonel Roche, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Toulouse, UPS, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Toulouse, LAAS, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[4] LUNAM Univ, Univ Catholique Ouest, LISA, 3 Pl Andre Leroy, F-49008 Angers, France
关键词
Continuous scheduling; Continuous resources; Linear efficiency functions; Energy constraints; Energetic reasoning; Branching scheme; Mixed-integer programming; BRANCH;
D O I
10.1007/s00291-015-0423-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper addresses a scheduling problem with a continuously divisible, cumulative and renewable resource with limited capacity. During its processing, each task consumes a part of this resource, which lies between a minimum and a maximum requirement. A task is finished when a certain amount of energy is received by it within its time window. This energy is received via the resource and an amount of resource is converted into an amount of energy with a non-decreasing and continuous function. The goal is to find a feasible schedule, which is already NP-complete, and then to minimize the resource consumption. For the case where all functions are linear, we present two new mixed-integer linear programs (MILP), as well as improvements of an existing formulation. We also present a detailed version of the adaptation of the well-known "left-shift/right-shift" satisfiability test for the cumulative constraint and the associated time-window adjustments to our problem. For this test, three ways of computing relevant intervals are described. Finally, a hybrid branch-and-bound using both the satisfiability test and the MILP is presented with a new heuristic for choosing the variable on which the branching is done. Computational experiments on randomly generated instances are reported in order to compare all of these solution methods.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 492
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energetic reasoning and mixed-integer linear programming for scheduling with a continuous resource and linear efficiency functions
    Margaux Nattaf
    Christian Artigues
    Pierre Lopez
    David Rivreau
    OR Spectrum, 2016, 38 : 459 - 492
  • [2] Irrigation scheduling using mixed-integer linear programming
    Anwar, AA
    Clarke, D
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2001, 127 (02) : 63 - 69
  • [3] Mixed-integer linear programming for project scheduling under various resource constraints
    Klein, Nicklas
    Gnagi, Mario
    Trautmann, Norbert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 319 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [4] Mixed-integer linear programming for resource leveling problems
    Rieck, Julia
    Zimmermann, Juergen
    Gather, Thorsten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 221 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [5] Mixed-time mixed-integer linear programming scheduling model
    Westerlund, Joakim
    Hastbacka, Mattias
    Forssell, Sebastian
    Westerlund, Tapio
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (09) : 2781 - 2796
  • [6] A mixed-integer linear programming model for the continuous casting planning
    Bellabdaoui, A.
    Teghem, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 104 (02) : 260 - 270
  • [7] Safe bounds in linear and mixed-integer linear programming
    Arnold Neumaier
    Oleg Shcherbina
    Mathematical Programming, 2004, 99 : 283 - 296
  • [8] Safe bounds in linear and mixed-integer linear programming
    Neumaier, A
    Shcherbina, O
    MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2004, 99 (02) : 283 - 296
  • [9] Deep Space Network Scheduling via Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
    Sabol, Alex
    Alimo, Ryan
    Kamangar, Farhad
    Madani, Ramtin
    IEEE Access, 2021, 9 : 39985 - 39994
  • [10] A mixed-integer linear programming scheduling optimization model for refinery production
    Zheng, Zhekui
    Zhang, Hongjing
    Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2016, 51 : 907 - 912