Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions recommended by national toolkits in primary and secondary healthcare sectors in England: TARGET and Start Smart Then Focus

被引:52
|
作者
Ashiru-Oredope, D. [1 ]
Budd, E. L. [1 ]
Bhattacharya, A. [1 ]
Din, N. [2 ]
McNulty, C. A. M. [3 ]
Micallef, C. [4 ,5 ]
Ladenheim, D. [6 ]
Beech, E. [7 ,8 ]
Murdan, S. [2 ]
Hopkins, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth England, Antimicrobial Resistance Programme, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut, London, England
[3] Gloucestershire Royal Hosp, Publ Hlth England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester GL1 3NN, England
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Pharm Dept, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Healthcare Associated Infect & Antimicrobial Resi, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Hlth Protect Res Unit, Hammersmith Campus, London, England
[6] East & North Herts NHS Trust, Pharm Dept, Hertford, England
[7] NHS Bath & North East Somerset Clin Commissioning, Bath, Avon, England
[8] NHS England Patient Safety Domain 5, London, England
关键词
URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; PHARMACISTS; ANTIBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkv492
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
To assess and compare the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions recommended within the national AMS toolkits, TARGET and Start Smart Then Focus, in English primary and secondary healthcare settings in 2014, to determine the prevalence of cross-sector engagement to drive AMS interventions and to propose next steps to improve implementation of AMS. Electronic surveys were circulated to all 211 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs; primary sector) and to 146 (out of the 159) acute trusts (secondary sector) in England. Response rates were 39% and 63% for the primary and secondary sectors, respectively. The majority of CCGs and acute trusts reported reviewing national AMS toolkits formally or informally (60% and 87%, respectively). However, only 13% of CCGs and 46% of acute trusts had developed an action plan for the implementation of these toolkits. Only 5% of CCGs had antimicrobial pharmacists in post; however, the role of specialist antimicrobial pharmacists continued to remain embedded within acute trusts, with 83% of responding trusts having an antimicrobial pharmacist at a senior grade. The majority of healthcare organizations review national AMS toolkits; however, implementation of the toolkits, through the development of action plans to deliver AMS interventions, requires improvement. For the first time, we report the extent of cross-sector and multidisciplinary collaboration to deliver AMS interventions in both primary and secondary care sectors in England. Results highlight that further qualitative and quantitative work is required to explore mutual benefits and promote best practice. Antimicrobial pharmacists remain leaders for implementing AMS interventions across both primary and secondary healthcare sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:1408 / 1414
页数:7
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes in Community Healthcare Organisations in England: A Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess Implementation of Programmes and National Toolkits
    Ashiru-Oredope, Diane
    Doble, Anne
    Akpan, Mary Richard
    Hansraj, Sejal
    Shebl, Nada Atef
    Ahmad, Raheelah
    Hopkins, Susan
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2018, 7 (04):
  • [2] Impact of COVID-19 on 'Start Smart, Then Focus' Antimicrobial Stewardship at One NHS Foundation Trust in England Prior to and during the Pandemic
    Elshenawy, Rasha Abdelsalam
    Umaru, Nkiruka
    Aslanpour, Zoe
    COVID, 2024, 4 (01): : 102 - 116
  • [3] UKHSA Start Smart Then Focus antimicrobial stewardship: effective implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic at an NHS Foundation Trust in the UK
    Elshenawy, Rasha Abdelsalam
    Umaru, Nkiruka
    Aslanpour, Zoe
    JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2024, 6