Ultrasound Guidance in Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:0
|
作者
Rashid, Mohammed K. [1 ]
Sahami, Nazanin [1 ]
Singh, Kuljit [2 ]
Winter, Jose [1 ]
Sheth, Tej [1 ]
Jolly, Sanjit S. [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Griffith Univ, Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Gold Coast, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY | 2019年 / 31卷 / 07期
关键词
arterial catheterization; femoral artery; ultrasound guidance; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; BLEEDING AVOIDANCE STRATEGIES; CARDIOVASCULAR DATA REGISTRY; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; RADIAL ACCESS; IMPACT; ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PREDICTORS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. During percutaneous cardiac procedures, the use of radial access is growing, but femoral access remains needed for large-bore, high-risk procedures. Methods are needed to make femoral access safer. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we assess whether ultrasound guidance is associated with a decreased risk of vascular complications during femoral artery catheterization. Methods. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to April 2018. RCTs assessing the use of ultrasound among adult patients undergoing a femoral artery catheterization were included. The primary outcome was vascular-access related complications. Secondary outcomes included major and minor vascular access bleeding, success rate, venipuncture, number of attempts, and successful placement into the common femoral artery. Results. Five RCTs (n =1553) met the inclusion criteria, with two trials using blinded outcome assessment. Ultrasound use was associated with a reduction in the rate of vascular-access related complications [1.9% vs 4.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.81; P<.01]. This was primarily driven by a reduction in local hematomas; once hematomas were excluded, the association was no longer significant (0.6% vs 1.7%; OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.07; P=.07). There was no significant reduction in major bleeding (0.3% vs 1.3%; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07-0.1.16; P=.08) or minor bleeding [1.4% vs 2.8%; OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.05; P=.07], Conclusions. Ultrasound guidance during femoral artery catheterization is associated with a decreased risk of vascular complications, primarily driven by a reduction in local hematomas. Larger trials are needed to determine the effect of ultrasound on major bleeding and vascular complications (excluding hematomas).
引用
收藏
页码:E192 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization of the Femoral Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sobolev, Maria
    Slovut, David P.
    Chang, Alfredo Lee
    Shiloh, Ariel L.
    Eisen, Lewis A.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 27 (07): : 318 - 323
  • [2] Ultrasound Guidance for Radial Artery Catheterization: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tang, Lu
    Wang, Fei
    Li, Yuxiang
    Zhao, Liang
    Xi, Huijun
    Guo, Zhihong
    Li, Xiuyun
    Gao, Chengjie
    Wang, Jian
    Zhou, Lingjun
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [3] Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization of the Radial Artery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Shiloh, Ariel L.
    Savel, Richard H.
    Paulin, Laura M.
    Eisen, Lewis A.
    CHEST, 2011, 139 (03) : 524 - 529
  • [4] Efficacy of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wan-Jie Gu
    Hong-Tao Tie
    Jing-Chen Liu
    Xian-Tao Zeng
    Critical Care, 18
  • [5] Efficacy of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gu, Wan-Jie
    Tie, Hong-Tao
    Liu, Jing-Chen
    Zeng, Xian-Tao
    CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [6] Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization of the Femoral Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (vol 27, pg 318, 2015)
    Sobolev, M.
    Slovut, D. P.
    Chang, A. L.
    Shiloh, A. L.
    Eisen, L. A.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 27 (10): : E230 - E230
  • [7] Ultrasound Guidance Facilitates Radial Artery Catheterization A Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gu, Wan-Jie
    Wu, Xiang-Dong
    Wang, Fei
    Ma, Zheng-Liang
    Gu, Xiao-Ping
    CHEST, 2016, 149 (01) : 166 - 179
  • [8] Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Teixeira, D. M.
    Dassuncao, L. A.
    Vieira, C. V. R.
    Barbosa, M. A. P.
    Coelho Neto, M. A.
    Nastri, C. O.
    Martins, W. P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (02) : 139 - 148
  • [9] Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gu, Wan-Jie
    Liu, Jing-Chen
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 40 (02) : 292 - 293
  • [10] Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wan-Jie Gu
    Jing-Chen Liu
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2014, 40 : 292 - 293