Tonopen Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry for Detecting Restrictive Thyroid Eye Disease

被引:9
|
作者
Rahman, Imran [1 ]
Cannon, Paul S. [1 ]
Sadiq, S. Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Eye Hosp, Manchester M13 WH, Lancs, England
来源
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2010年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE CHANGES; CORNEAL THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b80fcb
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: In thyroid eye disease (TED), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements are taken in both the primary and upgaze positions to elicit restrictive muscle disease. The aim of this study was to assess whether the IOP when measured with the eyes in upgaze (the Goldmann applanation tonometer [GAT] head applanating the inferior/peripheral cornea) is similar when compared with the central corneal IOP in upgaze using the Tono-Pen XL. Methods: IOP was measured with the GAT oil the central cornea in primary gaze and oil the inferior cornea in upgaze. IOP was measured with the Tono-Pen XL in the central cornea in both primary gaze and upgaze. The outcome measure was the difference in IOP readings between the GAT and the Tono-Pen XL for patients with restrictive TED. Results: Fifty-two patients were included in the study; 31 patients with restrictive TED and 21 control patients. In the control group, there was no significant difference in Tono-Pen XL and GAT readings for both primary gaze and upgaze (p = 0.99). Both instruments detected all increase in IOP with upgaze in patients with restrictive TED compared with controls (p = 0.0006). There was no significant difference between the 2 instruments' readings in upgaze for patients with restrictive TED (p = 0.39). Conclusions: Both the GAT and the Tono-Pen XL call be used to establish IOP in patients with restrictive TED.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 38
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Study of Rebound Tonometry With Tonopen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Following Vitreoretinal Surgery
    Grewal, Dilraj S.
    Stinnett, Sandra S.
    Folgar, Francisco A.
    Schneider, Eric W.
    Vajzovic, Lejla
    Asrani, Sanjay
    Freedman, Sharon F.
    Mruthyunjaya, Prithvi
    Hahn, Paul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 161 : 22 - 28
  • [2] Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry
    Bhartiya S.
    Bali S.J.
    Sharma R.
    Chaturvedi N.
    Dada T.
    International Ophthalmology, 2011, 31 (4) : 297 - 302
  • [3] Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma
    Salvetat, Maria L.
    Zeppieri, Marco
    Tosoni, Claudia
    Brusini, Paolo
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 85 (03): : 272 - 279
  • [4] Postural Change in Intraocular Pressure and Agreement between Goldmann Applanation, Tonopen, and Perkins Tonometry
    Aziz, Kanza
    Fu, Jing
    Varadaraj, Varshini
    Kretz, Alyssa Marie
    Moroi, Sayoko
    Friedman, David S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [5] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Pache, M
    Wilmsmeyer, S
    Lautebach, S
    Funk, J
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (08) : 763 - 767
  • [6] A Clinical Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Yalcinbayir, Ozgur
    Baykara, Mehmet
    Atasoy, Aydin
    Ozcetin, Hikmet
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2010, 41 (04) : 437 - 442
  • [7] GOLDMANN APPLANATION VERSUS HAND-APPLANATION AND SCHIOTZ INDENTATION TONOMETRY
    KRIEGLSTEIN, GK
    WALLER, WK
    ALBRECHT VON GRAEFES ARCHIV FUR KLINISCHE UND EXPERIMENTELLE OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 1975, 194 (01): : 11 - 16
  • [8] Dynamic Contour Tonometry versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry after vitrectomy
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Fuest, Matthias
    Roeler, Gernot
    Mazinani, Babac
    Plange, Niklas
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [9] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Fuest, Matthias
    Koutsonas, Antonios
    Roessler, Gernot
    Mazinani, Babac E.
    Walter, Peter
    Plange, Niklas
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (08) : 663 - 668
  • [10] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Mona Pache
    Sonja Wilmsmeyer
    Sonja Lautebach
    Jens Funk
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2005, 243 : 763 - 767