Statistical validation of reagent lot change in the clinical chemistry laboratory can confer insights on good clinical laboratory practice

被引:11
|
作者
Cho, Min-Chul [1 ,2 ]
Kim, So Young [3 ,4 ]
Jeong, Tae-Dong [5 ,6 ]
Lee, Woochang [5 ,6 ]
Chun, Sail [5 ,6 ]
Min, Won-Ki [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Jinju, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Sch Med, Jinju, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] St Pauls Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Ulsan, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[6] Asan Med Ctr, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
Quality assurance and control; laboratory methods; PROFICIENCY TESTING MATERIAL; FRESH-FROZEN SERUM; AMERICAN-PATHOLOGISTS SURVEYS; OF-THE-ART; INTERLABORATORY HARMONIZATION; COMMUTABILITY; ACCURACY; QUALITY; VERIFICATION; TRUENESS;
D O I
10.1177/0004563214520749
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Verification of new lot reagent's suitability is necessary to ensure that results for patients' samples are consistent before and after reagent lot changes. A typical procedure is to measure results of some patients' samples along with quality control (QC) materials. In this study, the results of patients' samples and QC materials in reagent lot changes were analysed. In addition, the opinion regarding QC target range adjustment along with reagent lot changes was proposed. Patients' sample and QC material results of 360 reagent lot change events involving 61 analytes and eight instrument platforms were analysed. The between-lot differences for the patients' samples ((P)) and the QC materials ((QC)) were tested by Mann-Whitney U tests. The size of the between-lot differences in the QC data was calculated as multiples of standard deviation (SD). The (P) and (QC) values only differed significantly in 7.8% of the reagent lot change events. This frequency was not affected by the assay principle or the QC material source. One SD was proposed for the cutoff for maintaining pre-existing target range after reagent lot change. While non-commutable QC material results were infrequent in the present study, our data confirmed that QC materials have limited usefulness when assessing new reagent lots. Also a 1 SD standard for establishing a new QC target range after reagent lot change event was proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 694
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality assessment and good laboratory practice in clinical chemistry laboratory at diagnostic laboratories in Nepal
    Gyawali, Prabin
    Lamsal, Nitesh
    Tamrakar, Sujan
    Shrestha, Raj
    Aryal, Pratibha
    Raut, Binay
    Aryal, Madhukar
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 44 (13) : S4 - S4
  • [2] Update laboratory testing for clinical trials - Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP)
    Wieland, Eberhard
    Kluehe, Cornelia
    Shipkova, Maria
    LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 37 (06): : 351 - 362
  • [3] The good laboratory practice and good clinical practice requirements for the production of radiopharmaceuticals in clinical research
    De Vos, FJ
    De Decker, M
    Dierckx, RA
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 26 (07) : 575 - 579
  • [4] ARE CLINICAL LABORATORY PROFICIENCY TESTS AS GOOD AS THEY CAN BE
    TIETZ, NW
    RODGERSON, DO
    LAESSIG, RH
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 38 (04) : 473 - 475
  • [5] Centralization of multisite reagent lot-to-lot validation for Ortho Clinical Vitros chemistry instruments
    To, Michelle
    Raizman, Joshua E.
    Goudreau, Bobbi-Lynn
    Higgins, Trefor
    Brun, Miranda
    Tsui, Albert K. Y.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 97 : 62 - 66
  • [6] QUALITY ASSURANCE WITHIN CLINICAL-CHEMISTRY - A BRIEF REVIEW EMPHASIZING GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
    ULDALL, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1987, 47 (05): : 507 - 518
  • [7] ESHRE certification of ART centres for good laboratory and clinical practice
    Gianaroli, Luca
    Veiga, Anna
    Gordts, Stephan
    Ebner, Thomas
    Woodward, Bryan
    Plas, Catherine
    van Groesen, Wil
    Sgargi, Serena
    Kovacic, Borut
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2022, 2022 (04)
  • [8] Evaluation of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP26-A Guideline: A Protocol for Reagent Lot-to-Lot Verification
    Katzman, Brooke M.
    Ness, Karl M.
    Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 143 : A28 - A28
  • [9] Measurement of natriuretic peptides in heart failure: the good laboratory and clinical practice
    Kovacs L Gabor
    Nyolczas Noemi
    Habon Tamas
    Sepp Robert
    Piroth Zsolt
    Hajas Agota
    Boncz Imre
    Tomcsanyi Janos
    Kappelmayer Janos
    Merkely Bela
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2015, 156 (31) : 1235 - 1245
  • [10] GOOD CLINICAL-PRACTICE - GENERAL-PRINCIPLES - A LABORATORY EXPERIENCE
    AVOUAC, B
    LIM, C
    BROUTIN, E
    POTERRE, M
    JUBE, L
    THERAPIE, 1988, 43 (06): : 457 - 460