Kidney-Sparing Methods for Extended-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) in Cervical Carcinoma Treatment

被引:10
|
作者
Kunogi, Hiroaki [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Nanae [1 ]
Terao, Yasuhisa [2 ]
Sasai, Keisuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Juntendo Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bunkyo Ku, 2-1-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1138421, Japan
[2] Juntendo Univ, Dept Gynecol, Bunkyo Ku, 2-1-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1138421, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; RADIATION-THERAPY; LYMPH-NODES; CONCURRENT CISPLATIN; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0156623
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Coplanar extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (EF-IMRT) targeting the whole-pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with advanced cervical cancer results in impaired creatinine clearance. An improvement in renal function cannot be expected unless low-dose (approximately 10 Gy) kidney exposure is reduced. The dosimetric method should be considered during EF-IMRT planning to further reduce low-dose exposure to the kidneys. To assess the usefulness of non-coplanar EF-IMRT with kidney-avoiding beams to spare the kidneys during cervical carcinoma treatment in dosimetric analysis between non-coplanar and coplanar EF-IMRT, we compared the doses of the target organ and organs at risk, including the kidney, in 10 consecutive patients. To estimate the influence of EFRT on renal dysfunction, creatinine clearance values after treatment were also examined in 18 consecutive patients. Of these 18 patients, 10 patients who were included in the dosimetric analysis underwent extended field radiation therapy (EFRT) with concurrent chemotherapy, and eight patients underwent whole-pelvis radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy to treat cervical carcinoma between April 2012 and March 2015 at our institution. In the dosimetric analysis, non-coplanar EF-IMRT was effective at reducing low-dose (approximately 10 Gy) exposure to the kidneys, thus maintaining target coverage and sparing other organs at risk, such as the small bowel, rectum, and bladder, compared with coplanar EF-IMRT. Renal function in all 10 patients who underwent EFRT, including coplanar EF-IMRT (with kidney irradiation), was low after treatment, and differed significantly from that of the eight patients who underwent WPRT (no kidney irradiation) 6 months after the first day of treatment (P = 0.005). In conclusion, non-coplanar EF-IMRT should be considered in patients with advanced cervical cancer, particularly in patients with a long life expectancy or with pre-existing renal dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can bone marrow dosimetric parameters predict for myelotoxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and extended-field intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy (EF-IMRT)?
    Gan, G. N.
    Beriwal, S.
    Heron, D. E.
    Kim, H.
    Lalonde, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S395 - S396
  • [2] Extended-Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (EF-IMRT) and Intra-Cavitary Brachytherapy Combined with Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter-Clinical Trial
    Hu, K.
    Ma, J.
    Zhang, F.
    Wei, L.
    He, J.
    Zhao, F.
    Zhong, W.
    Cheng, G.
    Sun, B.
    Wang, P.
    Shi, Y.
    Zhu, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E624 - E625
  • [3] Early clinical outcome with concurrent chemotherapy and extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Gan, Gregory N.
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Selvaraj, Rai N.
    Kim, Hayeon
    Lalonde, Ron
    Kelley, Joseph L.
    Edwards, Robert P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (01): : 166 - 171
  • [4] Extended-field radiotherapy bowel sparing for cervical cancer after surgical staging: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus helical tomotherapy
    Zhao, Xiujuan
    Liu, Xianfeng
    Chen, Duke
    He, Yanan
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [5] Concurrent chemotherapy and extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Updated results with extended follow-up
    Gan, G. N.
    Beriwal, S.
    Krivak, T. C.
    Heron, D. E.
    Kim, H.
    Kelley, J. L.
    Edwards, R. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S16 - S17
  • [6] Definitive Extended-field Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy with Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer with Para-aortic Nodal Metastasis
    Jung, Jinhong
    Park, Geumju
    Kim, Young Seok
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (08) : 4361 - 4366
  • [7] Extended field intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent nedaplatin treatment in cervical cancer
    Liu, Yunqin
    Yu, Jinming
    Qian, Liting
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Ma, Jun
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 11 (05) : 3421 - 3427
  • [8] Clinical outcome of extended-field irradiation vs. pelvic irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Ouyang, Yi
    Wang, Yanhong
    Chen, Kai
    Cao, Xinping
    Zeng, Yiming
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (06) : 7069 - 7076
  • [9] Impact of Bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients of cervical carcinoma
    Srivastava, Shraddha
    Batham, Shally
    Tuteja, Jasmeet Singh
    Varghese, Christopher
    Shyamprasad, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 197 : S298 - S299
  • [10] Outcomes for Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Extended-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Cisplatin
    Jensen, Lindsay G.
    Hasselle, Michael D.
    Rose, Brent S.
    Nath, Sameer K.
    Hasan, Yasmin
    Scanderbeg, Dan J.
    Yashar, Catheryn M.
    Mundt, Arno J.
    Mell, Loren K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (01) : 119 - 125