Reflecting on, and revising, international best practice principles for EIA follow-up

被引:21
|
作者
Morrison-Saunders, Angus [1 ,2 ]
Arts, Jos [2 ,3 ]
Bond, Alan [2 ,4 ]
Pope, Jenny [2 ,5 ]
Retief, Francois [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cown Univ, Ctr People Pl & Planet, Joondalup, Australia
[2] North West Univ, Res Unit Environm Sci & Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa
[3] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[5] Integral Sustainabil, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Environmental impact assessment; Follow-up; Best practice; Principles; Learning; Adaptive; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PLANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106596
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Follow-up is a vital component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), being essential for understanding assessment outcomes. Long-standing international best practice principles for EIA follow-up are reviewed, and revisions proposed, based on workshops with academics and practitioners, literature review and self-reflection. The proposed revision of EIA follow-up principles will feature an introduction with a simple definition and explanation of objectives for follow-up, and 15 principles. The revised principles address: objective; context; early establishment; project life-cycle; transparency; accessibility; accountability; performance criteria provision; enforcement; learning; adaptive environmental management; flexible or adaptive approach; tiering; cumulative effects and overall performance evaluation. Through publishing this proposal, it is hoped to simultaneously inform or inspire EIA practitioners to enhance their own follow-up knowledge and practices, and to seek input for further refinements that might lead to a revised set of international best practice principles for EIA follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distilling best practice principles for public participation in impact assessment follow-up
    Morrison-Saunders, Angus
    Arts, Jos
    Pope, Jenny
    Bond, Alan
    Retief, Francois
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2023, 41 (01) : 48 - 58
  • [2] The rationale for and practice of EIA follow-up: an analysis of Finnish road projects
    Jalava, Kimmo
    Haakana, Anne-Mari
    Kuitunen, Markku
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2015, 33 (04) : 255 - 264
  • [3] Phylloides tumours of the breast: best practice for follow-up
    Mylvaganam S.
    Toro C.
    Frank L.
    Vestey S.
    Thrush S.
    Updates in Surgery, 2015, 67 (1) : 91 - 95
  • [4] Towards increasing the utility of follow-up in Canadian EIA
    Noble, B
    Storey, K
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2005, 25 (02) : 163 - 180
  • [5] Appraising the value of independent EIA follow-up verifiers
    Wessels, Jan-Albert
    Retief, Francois
    Morrison-Saunders, Angus
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 50 : 178 - 189
  • [6] Nutritional follow-up of patients after obesity surgery: best practice
    O'Kane, Mary
    Barth, Julian H.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 84 (05) : 658 - 661
  • [7] A follow-up on the "Best Interests of the Child"
    Mclennan, John D.
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 32 (04) : 275 - 276
  • [8] DONOR FOLLOW-UP OF FLU VACCINE RELATED MULTIPLE EIA REACTIVITY
    ARNOLD, N
    SLADE, BA
    JONES, MM
    POPOVSKY, MA
    TRANSFUSION, 1992, 32 (08) : S67 - S67
  • [9] FOLLOW-UP FORMULAS AND THE INTERNATIONAL CODE
    GONZALEZRODRIGUEZ, CJ
    ARCHIVES FRANCAISES DE PEDIATRIE, 1992, 49 (01): : 67 - 67
  • [10] Lithium follow-up in general practice
    Moscovich, DG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1997, 51 (08) : 491 - 492