The selection of building material for wall construction by ants

被引:20
|
作者
Aleksiev, Antony S.
Sendova-Franks, Ana B.
Franks, Nigel R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Woodland Rd, Bristol BS8 1UG, Avon, England
[2] Univ W England, Sch Math Sci, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
ant colony; building material; foraging strategy; nest building; partial preferences; Temnothorax albipennis;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Building by ants often involves excavation, but Temnothorax albipennis colonies build walls in preformed cavities. To do this they need to choose and retrieve building material. Thus, building in T. albipennis can be analysed, in part, from the perspective of a foraging strategy. We gave ant colonies a choice between large and small sand grains that were available at three different distances. From theoretical considerations, we expected ant colonies to maximize the amount of material collected per unit time and therefore to choose large grains exclusively. Instead, they always chose grains of both sizes. Such partial preferences can be explained in terms of the mechanical benefits of constructing walls as a mixture of two grain sizes. Barricades composed of two grain sizes can be more resilient than walls made from a single grain size, as estimated in terms of angles of maximum stability and packing densities. Thus, foraging decisions need to be analysed in the broader context of how collected material is utilized. Here partial foraging preferences can have direct benefits: different choices by different foragers and even individual 'error' proneness might contribute to the collective good. (C) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 788
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual choice of building material for nest construction by worker ants and the collective outcome for their colony
    Aleksiev, Antony S.
    Longdon, Ben
    Christmas, Matthew J.
    Sendova-Franks, Ana B.
    Franks, Nigel R.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2007, 74 : 559 - 566
  • [2] A building material evaluation and selection model for the Turkish construction sector
    Tas, Elcin
    Yaman, Hakan
    Tanacan, Leyla
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 15 (02) : 149 - +
  • [3] Modernization of the worth preserving Building Structures: Construction Material for light Interior Wall
    Schroeder, Olaf
    MAUERWERK, 2007, 11 (04) : 222 - 224
  • [4] Selection and spatial arrangement of building materials during the construction of nest turrets by grass-cutting ants
    Roemer, Daniela
    Cosarinsky, Marcela I.
    Roces, Flavio
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2020, 7 (10):
  • [5] Material Efficiency of Building Construction
    Ruuska, Antti
    Hakkinen, Tarja
    BUILDINGS, 2014, 4 (03) : 266 - 294
  • [6] Aluminum as a material for building construction
    Frary, FC
    INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1935, 27 : 1128 - 1130
  • [7] Wall building materials in housing construction
    Sanders, Wiebke
    Keramische Zeitschrift, 2018, 70 (05) : 18 - 19
  • [8] Building Material Selection Criteria for Optimizing Building Maintainability
    Kanniyapan, Gunavathy
    Nesan, Lenin Jawahar
    Ganisen, Shubashini
    INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I - VI, 2015, 2015, : 3636 - 3644
  • [9] Autonomous Construction with Compliant Building Material
    Soleymani, Touraj
    Trianni, Vito
    Bonani, Michael
    Mondada, Francesco
    Dorigo, Marco
    INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 13, 2016, 302 : 1371 - 1388
  • [10] Bamboo as a sustainable building construction material
    Kumar Boity A.
    Bhandari H.
    Shukla S.
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 71 : 306 - 311