Meeting the EU 2°C climate target:: global and regional emission implications

被引:0
|
作者
den Elzen, Michel
Meinshausen, Malte
机构
[1] Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, NL-3720 AH Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
multi-gas emission pathway; climate target; Post-2012; commitments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article presents a set of multi-gas emission pathways for different CO2-equivalent concentration stabilization levels, i.e. 400, 450, 500 and 550 ppm CO2-equivalent, along with an analysis of their global and regional reduction implications and implied probability of achieving the EU climate target of 2 degrees C. For achieving the 2 degrees C target with a probability of more than 60%, greenhouse gas concentrations need to be stabilized at 450 ppm CO2-equivalent or below, if the 90% uncertainty range for climate sensitivity is believed to be 1.5-4.5 degrees C. A stabilization at 450 ppm CO2-equivalent or below (400 ppm) requires global emissions to peak around 2015, followed by substantial overall reductions of as much as 25% (45% for 400 ppm) compared to 1990 levels in 2050. In 2020, Annex I emissions need to be approximately 15% (30%) below 1990 levels, and non-Annex I emissions also need to be reduced by 15-20% compared to their baseline emissions. A further delay in peaking of global emissions by 10 years doubles maximum reduction rates to about 5% per year, and very probably leads to high costs. In order to keep the option open of stabilizing at 400 and 450 ppm CO2-equivalent, the USA and major advanced non-Annex I countries will have to participate in the reductions within the next 10-15 years.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 564
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impacts avoided with a 1.5 °C climate target: a global and regional assessment
    Nigel W. Arnell
    Jason A. Lowe
    Ben Lloyd-Hughes
    Timothy J. Osborn
    Climatic Change, 2018, 147 : 61 - 76
  • [2] The impacts avoided with a 1.5 A°C climate target: a global and regional assessment
    Arnell, Nigel W.
    Lowe, Jason A.
    Lloyd-Hughes, Ben
    Osborn, Timothy J.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2018, 147 (1-2) : 61 - 76
  • [3] Global travel within the 2 °C climate target
    Girod, Bastien
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Deetrnan, Sebastiaan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 45 : 152 - 166
  • [4] Energy system transformations and carbon emission mitigation for China to achieve global 2 °C climate target
    Zhao, Guangpu
    Yu, Biying
    An, Runying
    Wu, Yun
    Zhao, Zihao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 292
  • [5] Emission metrics under the 2 °C climate stabilization target
    Tanaka, Katsumasa
    Johansson, Daniel J. A.
    O'Neill, Brian C.
    Fuglestvedt, Jan S.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 117 (04) : 933 - 941
  • [6] Emission metrics under the 2 °C climate stabilization target
    Katsumasa Tanaka
    Daniel J. A. Johansson
    Brian C. O’Neill
    Jan S. Fuglestvedt
    Climatic Change, 2013, 117 : 933 - 941
  • [7] The climate challenge and EU cohesion policy: implications for regional policies
    Thoidou, Elisavet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 7 (03) : 303 - 320
  • [8] Integrated regional changes in arctic climate feedbacks: Implications for the global climate system
    McGuire, A. David
    Chapin, F. S., III
    Walsh, John E.
    Wirth, Christian
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 : 61 - 91
  • [9] EMISSION CERTIFICATE TRADE AND COSTS UNDER REGIONAL BURDEN-SHARING REGIMES FOR A 2 degrees C CLIMATE CHANGE CONTROL TARGET
    Kober, T.
    van der Zwaan, B. C. C.
    Rosler, H.
    CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2014, 5 (01)
  • [10] The southern African climate under 1.5 °C and 2 °C of global warming as simulated by CORDEX regional climate models
    Maure, G.
    Pinto, I.
    Ndebele-Murisa, M.
    Muthige, M.
    Lennard, C.
    Nikulin, G.
    Dosio, A.
    Meque, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (06):