Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts

被引:82
|
作者
Poehling-Monaghan, Kirsten L. [1 ]
Salem, Hytham [1 ]
Ross, Kirsten E. [2 ]
Secrist, Eric [2 ]
Ciccotti, Michael C. [1 ]
Tjoumakaris, Fotios [1 ]
Ciccotti, Michael G. [1 ]
Freedman, Kevin B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
ACL reconstruction; long-term; osteoarthritis; autograft; review; FOLLOW-UP; GRACILIS TENDON; RISK-FACTORS; SEMITENDINOSUS; REVISION;
D O I
10.1177/2325967117709735
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Much controversy still exists surrounding graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Over the past decade, an increase in comparative studies with longer follow-up has enhanced our understanding of current graft options and outcomes. Purpose: To describe the long-term comparative outcomes of ACL reconstruction with autograft bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) versus autograft hamstring (HS) ACL reconstruction with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies in the English language with outcome data comparing ACL reconstruction utilizing autograft BPTB and autograft HS; only studies with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Outcome data included failure and complications, manual and instrumented laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic risk of osteoarthritis. Results: Twelve studies with a total of 953 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 8 were level 1 evidence and 2 were level 2. Mean follow-up was 8.96 years (range, 5-15.3 years). No differences in graft failure or manual or instrumented laxity were seen in any studies. Lower clinical outcomes scores and greater motion loss were seen in BPTB patients in 1 and 2 studies, respectively. Two of 4 studies reporting on anterior knee pain, and 3 of 7 that recorded kneeling pain found it more frequently among BPTB patients. One study found significantly increased reoperation rates in HS patients, while another found a similar result in BPTB, and 1 study reported a significant increase in contralateral ACL tears in BPTB patients. Three of 5 studies reporting on radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis noted significantly increased rates in BPTB patients. Conclusion: This systematic review comparing long-term outcomes after ACL reconstruction with either autograft BPTB or autograft HS suggests no significant differences in manual/instrumented laxity and graft failures between graft types. An increase in long-term anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, and higher rates of osteoarthritis were noted with BPTB graft use.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Females: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts
    Salem, Hytham S.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Carter, Aaron H.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Freedman, Kevin B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 42 (03) : E295 - E304
  • [2] The Statistical Fragility of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies
    Ehlers, Cooper B.
    Curley, Andrew J.
    Fackler, Nathan P.
    Minhas, Arjun
    Chang, Edward S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (10): : 2827 - 2833
  • [3] Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Forster, MC
    Forster, IW
    KNEE, 2005, 12 (03): : 225 - 230
  • [4] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts
    Rainer Siebold
    Kate E. Webster
    Julian A. Feller
    Alasdair G. Sutherland
    Johanna Elliott
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2006, 14 : 1070 - 1076
  • [5] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts
    Siebold, Rainer
    Webster, Kate E.
    Feller, Julian A.
    Sutherland, Alasdair G.
    Elliott, Johanna
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (11) : 1070 - 1076
  • [6] A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Jansson, KA
    Linko, E
    Sandelin, J
    Harilainen, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01): : 12 - 18
  • [7] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Female Athletes: Patellar Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts
    Salem, Hytham S.
    Varzhapetyan, Vahe
    Patel, Nimit
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Freedman, Kevin B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (09): : 2086 - 2092
  • [8] Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Females Using Patellar-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Si Heng Sharon
    Lau, Bernard Puang Huh
    Krishna, Lingaraj
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08) : 770 - 787
  • [9] Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts
    Freedman, KB
    D'Amato, MJ
    Nedeff, DD
    Kaz, A
    Bach, BR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01): : 2 - 11