Formation Resistivity Prediction Using Decision Tree and Random Forest

被引:5
|
作者
Ibrahim, Ahmed Farid [1 ,2 ]
Abdelaal, Ahmed [1 ]
Elkatatny, Salaheldin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Coll Petr Engn & Geosci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Ctr Integrat Petr Res, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Formation resistivity prediction; Logging parameters; Machine learning; Complex carbonate sections; RESERVOIR; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13369-022-06900-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Formation resistivity (R-t) is a vital property for formation evaluation and calculation of water saturation and hydrocarbon in places. R-t can be estimated using core analysis and well logging. However, these processes are expensive and time-consuming. In addition, due to tool failure, and poor wellbore conditions, part of the well logging records may be missed. Hence, the objective of this paper is to predict the true formation resistivity in complex carbonate sections using decision tree (DT) and Random Forests (RF) machine learning (ML) techniques as a function of available well logging data. A data set of 5500 data points were collected from two vertical wells in carbonate formation. The data includes gamma-ray, bulk density, neutron density, compressional wave transit time, shear transient time, and the corresponding R-t. Data from Well-1 were used to develop the DT and RF models with training to the testing splitting ratio of 70:30. Dataset from Well-2 was used to validate the optimized models. The results showed the capabilities of the ML models to predict the formation resistivity from well-logging data. The correlation coefficient (R) between the actual and the predicted output values and the root mean square error (RMSE) was used to evaluate the models performance. R value for the RF model was found to be 0.99, and 0.98 for the training and the testing stages with a validation R value of 0.94. The RMSE for the developed models was less than 0.38 for training, testing, and validation stages. Using ML to predict the formation resistivity can fill the missing gaps in log tracks and save money by removing resistivity logs running in all offset wells in the same field.
引用
收藏
页码:12183 / 12191
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Formation Resistivity Prediction Using Decision Tree and Random Forest
    Ahmed Farid Ibrahim
    Ahmed Abdelaal
    Salaheldin Elkatatny
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2022, 47 : 12183 - 12191
  • [2] Classification and Prediction of Breast Cancer using Linear Regression, Decision Tree and Random Forest
    Murugan, S.
    Kumar, B. Muthu
    Amudha, S.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT TRENDS IN COMPUTER, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION (CTCEEC), 2017, : 763 - 766
  • [3] Using random forest and decision tree models for a new vehicle prediction approach in computational toxicology
    Mistry, Pritesh
    Neagu, Daniel
    Trundle, Paul R.
    Vessey, Jonathan D.
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 20 (08) : 2967 - 2979
  • [4] Using random forest and decision tree models for a new vehicle prediction approach in computational toxicology
    Pritesh Mistry
    Daniel Neagu
    Paul R. Trundle
    Jonathan D. Vessey
    Soft Computing, 2016, 20 : 2967 - 2979
  • [5] EFFICIENT PREDICTION OF STROKE PATIENTS USING RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM IN COMPARISON TO DECISION TREE ALGORITHM
    Mitra, Ritaban
    Rajendran, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (03) : 5660 - 5666
  • [6] Analysis & Estimation of Soil for Crop Prediction using Decision Tree and Random Forest Regression Methods
    Tolani, Manoj
    Bajpai, Ambar
    Balodi, Arun
    Sunny
    Wuttisittikulkij, Lunchakorn
    Kovintavewat, Piya
    2022 37TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS/SYSTEMS, COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (ITC-CSCC 2022), 2022, : 752 - 755
  • [7] A Detailed Review on Decision Tree and Random Forest
    Talekar, Bhusban
    Agrawal, Sachin
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 13 (14): : 245 - 248
  • [8] Prediction of cohesion and friction angle from well-logging data using decision tree and random forest
    Moaz Hiba
    Ahmed Farid Ibrahim
    Salaheldin Elkatatny
    Abdulwahab Ali
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (1)
  • [9] Decision tree and random forest models for outcome prediction in antibody incompatible kidney transplantation
    Shaikhina, Torgyn
    Lowe, Dave
    Daga, Sunil
    Briggs, David
    Higgins, Robert
    Khovanova, Natasha
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2019, 52 : 456 - 462
  • [10] Fast Intra Prediction Mode Decision for HEVC Using Random Forest
    Yan, Zhuge
    Cho, Siu-Yeung
    Welsen, Sherif
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE, VIDEO AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (IVSP 2019), 2019, : 45 - 49