Evaluation of Pediatric Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination-An Update

被引:9
|
作者
Murphy, Robert F. [1 ]
Nunez, Leah [2 ]
Barfield, William R. [1 ]
Mooney, James F., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Orthopaed, 96 Jonathan Lucas St,CSB 708, Charleston, SC 29492 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Coll Med, Charleston, SC 29492 USA
关键词
pediatric orthopaedics; Orthopaedic In-Training Examination; taxonomy; EXAMINATION OITE; SECTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0000000000000913
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pediatric orthopaedics is tested frequently on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). The most recent data on the pediatrics section of the OITE were generated from content 10 years old. The purpose of this study is to assess the pediatric orthopaedic questions on the 2011 to 2014 OITE, and to compare question categories and cognitive taxonomy with previous data. Methods: Four years (2011 to 2014) of OITE questions, answers, and references were reviewed. The number of pediatric questions per year was recorded, as well as presence of a clinical photo or imaging modality. Each question was categorized and assigned a cognitive taxonomy level. Categories included: knowledge; knowledge-treatment modalities; diagnosis; diagnosis/recognition of associated conditions; diagnosis/further studies; and diagnosis/treatment. Cognitive taxonomy levels included: simple recall, interpretation of data, and advanced problem-solving. Results: The 3 most commonly covered topics were upper extremity trauma (17.4%), scoliosis (10.1%), and developmental dysplasia of the hip (5.7%). Compared with previous data, the percentage of pediatric questions was constant (13% vs. 14%). Categorically, the more recent OITE examinations contained significantly fewer questions testing simple knowledge (19% vs. 39%, P=0.0047), and significantly more questions testing knowledge of treatment modalities (17% vs. 9%, P=0.016) and diagnosis with associated conditions (19% vs. 9%, P=0.0034). Regarding cognitive taxonomy, there was a significant increase in the average number of questions that required advanced problem-solving (57% vs. 46%, P=0.048). Significantly more questions utilized clinical photographs and imaging studies (62% vs. 48%, P=0.012). The most common reference materials provided to support correct responses included Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics (25.7%) and the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (23.4%). Conclusions: Although the percentage of pediatric questions on the OITE has remained essentially constant, the percentage of questions requiring advanced problem-solving or interpretation of images has increased significantly in the past 10 years. Knowledge of question type and content may be helpful for those involved in resident education and in the development of didactic pediatric orthopaedic curricula.
引用
收藏
页码:E394 / E397
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: Spine Questions
    Farjoodi, Payam
    Khanna, A. Jay
    Marker, David R.
    Frassica, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 67 (03) : 139 - 142
  • [2] Analysis of the Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination, 2002 through 2006
    Papp, Derek F.
    Ting, Beverlie L.
    Sargent, M. Catherine
    Frassica, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 30 (05) : 503 - 507
  • [3] An Updated Analysis of the Pediatric Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination
    Ellsworth, Bridget K.
    Premkumar, Ajay
    Shen, Tony
    Lebrun, Drake G.
    Cross, Michael B.
    Widmann, Roger F.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 40 (10) : E1017 - E1021
  • [4] Analysis of Questions in Sections of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: A Scoping Review
    Constantinescu, David S.
    Pavlis, William
    Lizardi, Juan J.
    Weinerman, Jonathan
    Best, Thomas M.
    Hornicek, Francis J.
    Dodds, Seth D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (06) : E318 - E326
  • [5] An Electronic Orthopaedic In-Training Examination
    Marsh, J. Lawrence
    Hruska, Laura
    Mevis, Howard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2010, 18 (10) : 589 - 596
  • [6] ORTHOPAEDIC IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (OITE)
    MANKIN, HJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1971, (75) : 108 - &
  • [7] Update on the in-training examination
    Rovinelli, Richard
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2007, 5 (06) : 564 - 564
  • [8] Hand Surgery Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: Analysis of Content and Reference
    Martin, Adam S.
    McMains, M. Craig
    Shacklett, Andrew G.
    Awan, Hisham M.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (06):
  • [9] Levels of Evidence Have Increased for Musculoskeletal Trauma Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination
    Grandizio, Louis C.
    Huston, James C.
    Shim, Stephanie S.
    Parenti, John M.
    Graham, Jove
    Klena, Joel C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (02) : 258 - 263
  • [10] Foot and Ankle Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: Analysis of Content, Reference, and Performance
    Barr, Cameron R.
    Cheng, Ivan
    Chou, Loretta B.
    Hunt, Kenneth J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (06) : E880 - E888