Is there a Lockean argument against expressivism?

被引：5

|

作者：

Smith, M ^{[1
]}

Stoljar, D ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

来源：

ANALYSIS | 2003年 / 63卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/1467-8284.t01-6-00631

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：76 / 86

页数：11

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] A Lockean Argument for Basic Income
Moseley, Daniel D.
BASIC INCOME STUDIES, 2011, 6 (02)
[2] Spoilage and Squatting: A Lockean Argument
Harding, Eloise
RES PUBLICA-A JOURNAL OF MORAL LEGAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 26 (03): : 299 - 317
[3] Spoilage and Squatting: A Lockean Argument
Eloise Harding
Res Publica, 2020, 26 : 299 - 317
[4] A Lockean Argument for Black Reparations
Bernard R. Boxill
The Journal of Ethics, 2003, 7 (1) : 63 - 91
[5] Epistemic expressivism and the argument from motivation
Kappel, Klemens
Moeller, Emil F. L.
SYNTHESE, 2014, 191 (07) : 1529 - 1547
[6] Epistemic expressivism and the argument from motivation
Klemens Kappel
Emil F. L. Moeller
Synthese, 2014, 191 : 1529 - 1547
[7] A LOCKEAN ARGUMENT FOR UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
Hausman, Daniel M.
SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY, 2011, 28 (02): : 166 - 191
[8] WHO OWNS RENEWABLE ENERGY? AN ARGUMENT FOR LOCKEAN-INSPIRED OWNERSHIP
Fagan, Paul
ETHICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 25 (02) : 119 - 142
[9] AGAINST EXPRESSIVISM: WORDSWORTH'S CYBERPOETICS
Rzepka, Charles J.
WORDSWORTH CIRCLE, 2019, 50 (03): : 389 - 412
[10] The Lockean efficiency argument and aboriginal land rights (Aboriginal rights, Australia, New Zealand)
Kolers, A
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2000, 78 (03) : 391 - 404

← 1 2 3 4 5 →