Queenless colonies contribute to the male breeding population at honey bee drone congregation areas

被引:10
|
作者
Utaipanon, P. [1 ]
Holmes, M. J. [1 ]
Oldroyd, B. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Behav & Genet Social Insects Lab, Ecol & Evolut, Macleay Bldg A12, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Worker reproduction; Reproductive success; Worker reproductive parasitism; Effective population size; Population sampling; Drone congregation area; APIS-MELLIFERA COLONIES; WORKER REPRODUCTION; WING WEAR; SIZE; HYMENOPTERA; QUEENRIGHT; EVOLUTION; DENSITY; ANARCHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00040-019-00720-0
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Honey bee workers can lay eggs that result in viable males (drones). In queenless colonies, workers activate their ovaries and lay eggs, both in their own colony and in other queenless colonies. While worker reproduction and reproductive parasitism are well demonstrated, the direct contribution of reproductive workers to the gene pool is unclear. Queenless workers mostly lay their eggs in worker-sized brood cells. The resulting drones are smaller than normal drones. We determined two measures of forewing size in drones reared in drone-sized cells (DC) and in worker-sized cells (WC). Forewing length and width were 5.78 +/- 0.26 mm (+/- SD) and 1.27 +/- 0.08 mm, respectively, for drones reared in DC, and 5.01 +/- 0.21 mm and 1.11 +/- 0.05 mm for drones reared in WC. Discriminant function analysis indicated that forewing length alone is sufficient to differentiate DC and WC drones. To determine the contribution of worker-laid drones to the mating population, we sampled males at a natural mating lek using a Williams' drone trap every month for 12 months. We used the discriminant function to assign drones as being DC or WC based on their forewing length and a strict classification criterion of >= 0.99% posterior probability of assignment to one or other group. We estimate that about 0.23% of sampled males were reared in WC and were, therefore, likely to have been laid by workers. Our results suggest that queenless workers and queenless colonies make a small contribution to the male mating population, and that this contribution may be sufficient to provide ongoing selection for worker reproductive parasitism.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 599
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Queenless colonies contribute to the male breeding population at honey bee drone congregation areas
    P. Utaipanon
    M. J. Holmes
    B. P. Oldroyd
    Insectes Sociaux, 2019, 66 : 593 - 599
  • [2] Drone congregation areas - One aspect of honey bee mating
    Cramp, DC
    AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL, 1998, 138 (01): : 29 - 33
  • [3] HONEY-BEE DRONE FLYWAYS AND CONGREGATION AREAS - RADAR OBSERVATIONS
    LOPER, GM
    WOLF, WW
    TAYLOR, OR
    JOURNAL OF THE KANSAS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1992, 65 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [4] Landscape analysis of drone congregation areas of the honey bee, Apis mellifera
    Galindo-Cardona, Alberto
    Monmany, A. Carolina
    Moreno-Jackson, Rafine
    Rivera-Rivera, Carlos
    Huertas-Dones, Carlos
    Caicedo-Quiroga, Laura
    Giray, Tugrul
    JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE, 2012, 12
  • [5] DRONE BROOD IN HONEY BEE COLONIES
    ALLEN, MD
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1958, 51 (01) : 46 - 48
  • [6] The use of drone congregation behaviour for population surveys of the honey bee Apis cerana
    Hagan, Thomas
    Lim, Julianne
    Buchmann, Gabriele
    Ding, Guiling
    Oldroyd, Benjamin P.
    Gloag, Rosalyn
    APIDOLOGIE, 2024, 55 (01)
  • [7] The use of drone congregation behaviour for population surveys of the honey bee Apis cerana
    Thomas Hagan
    Julianne Lim
    Gabriele Buchmann
    Guiling Ding
    Benjamin P. Oldroyd
    Rosalyn Gloag
    Apidologie, 2024, 55
  • [8] Genotypic diversity in queenless honey bee colonies reduces fitness
    Bratkowski, Janusz
    Pirk, Christian W. W.
    Neumann, Peter
    Wilde, Jerzy
    JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (04) : 336 - 341
  • [9] Queenless colonies of the Asian red dwarf honey bee (Apis florea) are infiltrated by workers from other queenless colonies
    Chapman, Nadine C.
    Nanork, Piyamas
    Gloag, Rosalyn S.
    Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Wandee
    Beekman, Madeleine
    Oldroyd, Benjamin P.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) : 817 - 820
  • [10] THE PRODUCTION OF DRONE COMB AND DRONE BROOD IN HONEY-BEE COLONIES
    SZABO, TL
    AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL, 1995, 135 (09): : 642 - 643