A scoping method for human performance integrity and reliability assessment in process industries

被引:1
|
作者
Kyriakidis, Miltos [1 ]
Dang, Vinh N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
CREAM; expert judgment; human performance integrity; oil refineries; questionnaire survey; safety assessment; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SHAPING FACTORS; CREAM MODEL; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; SAFETY; FUZZY; MAINTENANCE; ACCIDENTS; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/prs.12260
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
An approach to manage human performance related risks in petrochemical sector is to use human reliability analyses (HRA) techniques. However, the focus of HRAs on individuals and on decomposed tasks overlooks the likelihood that collective actions and behaviors might lead to system failures. This study introduces an alternative approach, referred to as Human Performance Integrity (HPI) index, to assess human performance conditions on the whole, as they relate to safety, in petrochemical facilities. Additionally, the approach is used to rate installations in terms of their defenses against safety-relevant human failures. The HPI index is built upon the notions of Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method. By means of a 42-question survey, data was collected on the factors that improve or reduce human performance in 11 oil refineries. Data was used to assess the facilities' safety performance. Results were compared against information obtained from relevant investigation reports, as well as and an independent evaluation of the facilities carried out by certified auditors. Findings support the use of HPI index from novice and experienced scholars and/or practitioners as a quick and effortless, yet sound and efficient manner to assess safety and reliability performance of oil refineries from a human factors perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 233
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a process for human reliability assessment in a defence industries context
    Ng, GAL
    Gibson, WH
    Kirwan, BA
    Siemieniuch, CE
    Sinclair, MA
    CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS 2004, 2004, : 465 - 469
  • [2] Reliability, Performance and Integrity Assessment for Bridge Design and Maintenance
    Koh, Hyun-Moo
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2011, 7 (7-8) : 455 - 456
  • [3] High Reliability Management in Process Industries: Sustained by Human Factors
    Shemwell, S.
    Brooks, D.
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2015, 23 (01) : 32 - 32
  • [4] Risk and reliability assessment in chemical process industries using Bayesian methods
    Roy, Arnab
    Srivastava, Prashant
    Sinha, Shishir
    REVIEWS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 30 (05) : 479 - 499
  • [5] A Human Reliability Analysis Method based on Cognitive Process Model for Risk Assessment
    Ye, Huimin
    Zheng, Wei
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT RAIL TRANSPORTATION (ICIRT), 2016, : 418 - 424
  • [6] RELIABILITY ENGINEERING FOR PROCESS PLANT INDUSTRIES
    FRESHWAT.DC
    BUFFHAM, BA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS AND THE CHEMICAL ENGINEER, 1969, 47 (08): : C367 - &
  • [7] Evidential FMEA method for human reliability assessment
    Cai, Mei
    Xiao, Jingmei
    Luo, Qian
    Gao, Yu
    Jian, Xinglian
    Wang, Ya
    QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2024, 36 (01) : 21 - 35
  • [8] Quantitative developments in the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for the assessment of human performance
    Marseguerra, Marzio
    Zio, Enrico
    Librizzi, Massimo
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2006, 33 (10) : 894 - 910
  • [9] Improvement of the impact-echo method for the higher reliability in the structural integrity assessment
    Cho, Mi-Ra
    Kim, Ki Bong
    Joh, Sung-Ho
    Kang, Tae-Ho
    ADVANCED NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION I, PTS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 321-323 : 336 - 339
  • [10] INCORPORATING PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS INTO THE ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN RELIABILITY
    EMBREY, DE
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1980, 35 (NOV): : 162 - 163