Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets

被引:28
|
作者
Carlton, Dennis W. [1 ,2 ]
Waldman, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Johnson Grad Sch Management, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
来源
关键词
SWITCHING COSTS; DURABLE-GOODS; MARKET; DURABILITY; REFUSALS; ORDERS; DEAL;
D O I
10.1093/jleo/ewp006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consider a durable goods producer that has the option of monopolizing an aftermarket such as repair for its own product. An important question is whether such monopolization reduces welfare? We show that the answer to this question is frequently no. In particular, we explore three models that illustrate various ways in which aftermarket monopolization can reduce inefficiencies and thus increase social welfare and frequently also consumer welfare. Our article shows that efficiency enhancing aftermarket monopolization may be much more common than previous literature suggests. (JEL K21, L12, L49).
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 91
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条