Third-Party Governance under No Child Left Behind: Accountability and Performance Management Challenges

被引:16
|
作者
Heinrich, Carolyn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jopart/mup035
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study examines public management challenges faced by educational agencies that are required to set up a market for providing choice in supplemental educational services (SES) for students in underperforming schools and to hold nongovernmental providers accountable for their performance in increasing student achievement. The operations and performance of SES providers in a large urban school district, as well as how their performance in increasing student achievement relates to their market shares, are examined empirically and through qualitative information gathered through focus groups, interviews, and student surveys. The study finds that SES provider market shares were not highly correlated with estimates of provider performance or other relevant vendor characteristics, and local educational agencies were not satisfied with their level of control over service quality and educational outcomes. Control over the flow of funds, which improved over time, was their primary lever for managing these third-party relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:I59 / I80
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incentives in Third-Party Governance: Management Practices and Accountability Implications
    Girth, Amanda M.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2017, 77 (03) : 433 - 444
  • [2] Are third-party assurances preferable to third-party comments for promoting financial accountability in environmental reporting?
    Nishitani, Kimitaka
    Haider, Mohammad Badrul
    Kokubu, Katsuhiko
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 248
  • [3] Principal Turnover Under No Child Left Behind Accountability Pressure
    Mitani, Hajime
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2019, 121 (02):
  • [4] Citizen Attributions of Blame in Third-Party Governance
    Marvel, John D.
    Girth, Amanda M.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (01) : 96 - 108
  • [5] Performance Management Evaluation Model for third-party logistics companies
    Nae, Ilie
    Severin, Irina
    Solomon, Gheorghe
    VISION 2020: INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY, AND COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2016, VOLS I - VII, 2016, : 3953 - 3965
  • [6] Bureaucratic accountability in third-party governance: Experimental evidence of blame attribution during times of budgetary crisis
    Piatak, Jaclyn
    Mohr, Zachary
    Leland, Suzanne
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 95 (04) : 976 - 989
  • [7] Third-party relational governance and collaborative innovation performance: The role of IPR protection
    Ou Bai
    Jiang Wei
    Xiaohua Yang
    Roger (Rongxin) Chen
    InternationalJournalofInnovationStudies, 2020, 4 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [8] Consenting Under Third-Party Coercion
    Kiener, Maximilian
    JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 19 (04) : 361 - 389
  • [9] Third-party Cloud Risk Management
    Pinto, Breno Silva
    Cioffi, Lucas
    Esposito, Felipe
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER SECURITY AND RESILIENCE, CSR, 2024, : 445 - 451
  • [10] The need for third-party coordination in supply chain governance
    Bitran, Gabriel R.
    Gurumurthi, Suri
    Sam, Shiou Lin
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 48 (03) : 30 - +