Benefits and costs of deforestation by smallholders: Implications for forest conservation and climate policy

被引:32
|
作者
Cacho, Oscar J. [1 ]
Milne, Sarah [2 ]
Gonzalez, Ricardo [3 ,4 ]
Tacconi, Luca [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, UNE Business Sch, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Univ S Pacific, Sch Econ, Suva, Fiji
[4] Univ La Frontera, Fac Agr & Forest Sci, Dept Forest Sci, Temuco, Chile
关键词
REDD; Oil palm; Deforestation; Smallholders; Opportunity cost; Marginal abatement cost; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; PROPERTY RELATIONS; REDD PLUS; OIL PALM; PAYMENTS; EMISSIONS; SUMATRA; OPPORTUNITIES; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.012
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Deforestation is a leading cause of biodiversity loss and an important source of global carbon emissions. This means that there are important synergies between climate policy and conservation policy. The highest rates of deforestation occur in tropical countries, where much of the land at the forest frontier is managed informally by smallholders and where governance systems tend to be weak. These features must be considered when designing policies to reduce emissions from deforestation such as REDD+. Deforestation is often accompanied by fires that release large amounts of carbon dioxide. These emissions are especially high in the case of peatlands which contain thick layers of carbon-rich matter. In this paper we derive marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves using data from a farmer survey in Sumatra, where rates of peatland deforestation are high. Comparing these results with farmers' stated willingness to accept payment not to clear forest to establish oil palm suggests that REDD+ policies may be more expensive than MAC estimates suggest The extent to which this is true depends on the types of soils being deforested. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 332
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefits and costs to China of a climate policy
    Aunan, Kristin
    Berntsen, Terje
    O'Connor, David
    Persson, Therese Hindman
    Vennemo, Haakon
    Zhai, Fan
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 12 : 471 - 497
  • [2] Forest conservation policy in a changing climate
    Winkel, Georg
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 1 - 5
  • [3] Benefits and Costs of Improved Cookstoves: Assessing the Implications of Variability in Health, Forest and Climate Impacts
    Jeuland, Marc A.
    Pattanayak, Subhrendu K.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [4] The role of domestic timber markets in tropical deforestation and forest degradation in Ecuador: Implications for conservation planning and policy
    Sierra, R
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (02) : 327 - 340
  • [5] Evaluating the costs of primary forest conservation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, implications for policy and practice
    Bush, Glenn
    Taye, Fitalew Agimass
    Fleming, Christopher
    Samndong, Raymond Achu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 352
  • [6] Deforestation and forest land use: Theory, evidence, and policy implications
    Hyde, WF
    Amacher, GS
    Magrath, W
    WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 1996, 11 (02): : 223 - 248
  • [7] Forest conservation and deforestation in the tropics
    Roper, J
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2000, 76 (01): : 124 - 125
  • [8] Frequent policy uncertainty can negate the benefits of forest conservation policy
    Simmons, B. Alexander
    Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo
    Law, Elizabeth A.
    Bryan, Brett A.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 89 : 401 - 411
  • [9] The effects of uncertain forest conservation benefits on long-run deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
    Di Corato, Luca
    Moretto, Michele
    Vergalli, Sergio
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 23 (04) : 413 - 433
  • [10] INDIAN FOREST CONSERVATION AND TROPICAL DEFORESTATION
    RAVINDRANATH, NH
    HALL, DO
    AMBIO, 1994, 23 (08) : 521 - 523