Sediment Flushout from Pond of River Diversion Barrages by Gate Operation

被引:2
|
作者
Ghosh, Malay Kanti [1 ]
Dutta, Som [2 ]
Sen, Dhrubajyoti [3 ]
机构
[1] Govt West Bengal, Water Resources Invest & Dev Dept, Midnapore, India
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Midnapore, W Bengal, India
关键词
Sediment; Barrage; ANN; Flushing; Gate operation;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-014-0804-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction of river diversion barrages produces a shallow reservoir, called the pond, which is used more often for flow balancing between the inflows of the river and the outflows of the off-taking canal. However, deposition of sediment in the pond due to the relatively low velocities reduces the pond capacity. The current study investigates the effectiveness of gate operation and variations of other parameters in flushing out these sediment mounds, or shoals, from the barrage pond. Data from laboratory experiments on a scaled model of a prototype barrage is used to train and test different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models of the system. The models map the relationship between flushing efficiency of a sediment shoal from the upstream of a barrage, and the parameters river discharge, barrage pond depth and area of gate opening, position of the sediment shoal with respect to the barrage. The ANN models are then used to study the effect of different parameters on the sediment flushing efficiency. Apart from river discharge and net area of gate opening, upstream pond depth is also found to have a significant effect on flushing efficiency, with a general trend of decrease in efficiency with increase in pond depth becoming apparent. Efficacy of different gate opening pattern is also tested, with the 'inverted arch' gate opening pattern proving to be the most efficient when compared with 'arch' and 'uniform' gate opening.
引用
收藏
页码:5335 / 5356
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sediment Flushout from Pond of River Diversion Barrages by Gate Operation
    Malay Kanti Ghosh
    Som Dutta
    Dhrubajyoti Sen
    Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 5335 - 5356
  • [2] Denitrification Potential of Lake Sediment at the Davis Pond Mississippi River Freshwater Diversion Site, Louisiana, USA
    Lindau, C. W.
    Iwai, R. R.
    Delaune, R. D.
    Gambrell, R. P.
    JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 2009, 24 (02) : 181 - 189
  • [3] Change in sediment transport regime of the Keelung River in Taiwan induced by the operation of Yuanshantze flood diversion tunnel
    Lee, Tsung-Yu
    Teng, Tse-Yang
    Lee, Jun-Yi
    Pan, Yen-Wei
    Chen, Ming
    Chiu, Chi-Cheng
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):
  • [4] Searching for multipurpose uses of water and sediment in the practice of diversion from the Yellow River
    Xu, Jingpo
    He, Furong
    2000, Water Resources & Electric Power Press, China
  • [5] Searching for multipurpose uses of water and sediment in the practice of diversion from the Yellow River
    Xu, Jingpo
    He, Furong
    Nisha Yanjiu/Journal of Sediment Research, 2000, (02): : 19 - 22
  • [6] A review of sediment diversion in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain
    Xu, Kehui
    Bentley, Samuel J.
    Day, John W.
    Freeman, Angelina M.
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2019, 225
  • [7] Management of tailings pond water at the Kettle River Operation
    Ferguson, RB
    CIM BULLETIN, 1999, 92 (1029): : 67 - 69
  • [8] Diversion model of flow and sediment transport with erosion and deposition in river
    Tan, GM
    Yu, XM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RIVER SEDIMENTATION, VOLS 1-4, 2004, : 1571 - 1576
  • [9] A Hydrograph-Based Sediment Availability Assessment: Implications for Mississippi River Sediment Diversion
    Rosen, Timothy
    Xu, Y. Jun
    WATER, 2014, 6 (03) : 564 - 583
  • [10] Backwater profile during barrage gate operation for variable pond levels
    Barman, B.C.
    Sahu, R.B.
    Bhandari, G.
    ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 20 (03) : 239 - 249