FROM AUTOMATIC DISCOURSE ANALYSIS TO DESIRE SUBJECT DISCOURSE: PSYCHOCHANNELITICAS REFLECTIONS ON THE THEORY OF SPEECH OF MICHEL PECHEUX

被引:0
|
作者
Freire de Souza, Sergio Augusto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Amazonas, Programa Posgrad Letras PPGL, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Amazonas, CNPq, Grp Pesquisa Discurso & Prat Sociais, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
来源
关键词
AAD-69; Psychoanalysis; Resistance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Michel Pecheux's Discourse Analysis has its inaugural moment when Analyse automatique du discours (AAD-69) came out in 1969. From its inception, the notion of subject has been present as one of the many organizers of the epistemological processes of the theory. But the notion of subject is not any notion. A notion of contingent subject is called upon. The subject in the theory is summoned by ideology and barred by the unconscious. This article aims to follow the emergence of this notion and to map its pathway in relation to the theory development. From a descriptive place for the unconscious subject, we propose a move to a dynamic feature for this subject. At the same time ideology tries to define meanings within its scope, it also produces instinctual resistance that ultimately provokes and permits ideological disidentification. The article is divided into three parts. In the first part, we return to the theoretical constitution of Discourse Analysis, briefly revisiting its phases and constructs to understand how psychoanalysis appears in the aggiornamento of Pecheux's theory. In a second moment, we bring to the discussion the text "There is only cause for what fails" (PECHEUX, 1978), in which Pecheux rectifies previous positions and emphasizes the theoretical, political and historical value of failure, thus evidencing the link with presence of psychoanalysis in relation to the subject. Finally, we conclude by pointing to a broadening of the analysis that goes beyond recurrences and aims at the interpretation of the subject's resistance policies, based on psychoanalysis. By so thinking, discourse can be understood in its constitutive contradiction of the same and the different producing meaning and subjectivity in its double aspect, that of ideology and the unconscious.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 334
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条