A single index for voltage quality ranking in the distribution power networks using multiple criteria decision-making

被引:6
|
作者
Bajaj, Mohit [1 ]
Singh, Amit Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Narela, India
关键词
AHP; decision-making; voltage distortion; voltage fluctuations; voltage quality index; voltage unbalance; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/2050-7038.12965
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The quality of voltage is a fundamental characteristic that forms a crucial part of reliability in smart distribution power grids and subsequently being cautious to that is obligatory. Voltage quality (VQ) issues can be categorized into manifold categories such as voltage fluctuation, voltage harmonic distortion, voltage unbalance etc, depending upon the type of deviation from the standard sinusoidal one in terms of magnitude and frequency. For evaluating the VQ at a distribution system's bus, classically all the crucial phenomena associated indices are obligatory to be discretely measured and benchmarked for guaranteeing the global healthy VQ performance, which makes the assessment of the same a quite cumbersome. This paper attempts to streamline the overall VQ evaluation process by the application of multiple criteria decision-making. The scores of all VQ phenomena are computed by applying the analytic hierarchy process considering the multiple criteria of impacts on the consumer. The steps of the proposed methodology result in the formulation of an overall VQ index, which is alone adequate for raking the VQ performance of all the buses in a distribution power network. The proposed approach's application importance is checked and validated using data collected from a modified IEEE 13-bus test distribution system with and without the inclusion of distributed generation systems using MATLAB programming.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A ranking method for multiple-criteria decision-making
    Borgulya, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1997, 28 (09) : 905 - 912
  • [2] Decision-making for the hazard ranking of water distribution networks using the TOPSIS method
    Park, HaeKeum
    Kim, KiBum
    Hyung, JinSeok
    Kim, TaeHyeon
    Koo, Jayong
    WATER SUPPLY, 2023, 23 (02) : 715 - 726
  • [3] MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    GRANDZOL, J
    GERSHON, M
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 1994, 27 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [4] Ranking project success criteria in power engineering companies using fuzzy decision-making method
    Phong Thanh Nguyen
    Thu Anh Nguyen
    Quyen Le Hoang Thuy To Nguyen
    Vy Dang Bich Huynh
    Khoa Dang Vo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (08): : 91 - 94
  • [5] A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING)
    BRANS, JP
    VINCKE, PH
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) : 647 - 656
  • [6] Ranking of Internet Service Providers Considering Customer Priorities using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Dheeraj, M.
    Teja, G. Sai
    Yathendra, N.
    Supriya, M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART TECHNOLOGIES FOR SMART NATION (SMARTTECHCON), 2017, : 1213 - 1220
  • [7] RANKING STOCKS USING THE FUZZY MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH
    Tsao, Chung-Tsen
    NEW MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL COMPUTATION, 2006, 2 (03) : 331 - 344
  • [8] Using simulation to incorporate dynamic criteria into multiple criteria decision-making
    Aickelin, Uwe
    Reps, Jenna Marie
    Siebers, Peer-Olaf
    Li, Peng
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2018, 69 (07) : 1021 - 1032
  • [9] "Power ranking" professional circuit eSports teams using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
    Pradhan, Sean
    Abdourazakou, Yann
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS ANALYTICS, 2020, 6 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [10] Ranking Turkish Cities and Regions for Air Quality Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method
    Ari, Emin Sertac
    Ozkose, Hakan
    Gencer, Cevriye
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2016, 25 (05): : 1823 - 1830