THE CONDITIONS OF MORAL REALISM

被引:8
|
作者
Miller, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
LOVE MINIMALISM; EXPRESSIVISM; TRUTH; COGNITIVISM;
D O I
10.5840/jpr_2009_5
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
My aim is to provide an account of the conditions of moral realism whereby there are still significant metaphysical commitments made by the realist that set the view apart as a distinct position in the contemporary meta-ethical landscape. In order to do so, I will be appealing to a general account of what it is for realism to be true in any domain of experience, whether it be realism about universals, realism about unobservable scientific entities, realism about artifacts, and so forth. If the result is an informative taxonomy of meta-ethical positions, which can isolate something that is still at stake between the rival positions, then such a result should be of significant interest to philosophers working in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 155
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Moral realism, quasi-realism and moral steadfastness
    Chamberlain, James
    RATIO, 2022, 35 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [2] Intentional realism and moral realism
    Ross, Steven
    PHILOSOPHICAL FORUM, 2006, 37 (02): : 205 - 225
  • [3] Moral realism
    Lemmens, W
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE, 1998, 60 (04): : 778 - 779
  • [4] MORAL REALISM
    Railton, Peter
    Courville, Denis
    ATELIERS DE L ETHIQUE-THE ETHICS FORUM, 2016, 11 (2-3): : 171 - 212
  • [5] Moral relativism is moral realism
    Harman, Gilbert
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2015, 172 (04) : 855 - 863
  • [6] Moral relativism is moral realism
    Gilbert Harman
    Philosophical Studies, 2015, 172 : 855 - 863
  • [7] MORAL CONFLICT AND MORAL REALISM
    TANNSJO, T
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1985, 82 (03): : 113 - 117
  • [8] Moral realism
    Duhamel, A
    DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2001, 40 (04) : 830 - 833
  • [9] MORAL REALISM
    RAILTON, P
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1984, 81 (10): : 622 - 623
  • [10] Moral realism
    Chapouthier, G
    REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2001, 126 (03): : 391 - 393