Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI)

被引:3
|
作者
McInturff, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Coen, Florent-Valery [4 ]
Hight, Ariel E. [1 ,2 ]
Tarabichi, Osama [1 ,3 ]
Kanumuri, Vivek V. [1 ,3 ]
Vachicouras, Nicolas [4 ]
Lacour, Stephanie P. [4 ]
Lee, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brown, M. Christian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Eaton Peabody Labs, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Program Speech & Hearing Biosci & Technol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, Lab Soft Bioelect Interfaces, Ctr Neuroprosthet, Inst Bioengn,Inst Microengn, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Neuroprosthesis; Cochlear nucleus; Inferior colliculus; Multiunit activity; Local field potential; Deafness; VENTRAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; PHYSIOLOGICALLY CHARACTERIZED CELLS; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; HORSERADISH-PEROXIDASE; ACOUSTIC STRIAE; ARRAY POSITION; CAT; DORSAL; ORGANIZATION; PROJECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-022-00840-8
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing to deaf patients by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Whether such stimulation activates one or the other of the CN's two major subdivisions is not known. Here, we demonstrate clear response differences from the stimulation of the dorsal (D) vs. ventral (V) subdivisions of the CN in a mouse model of the ABI with a surface-stimulating electrode array. For the DCN, low levels of stimulation evoked multiunit responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) that were unimodally distributed with early latencies (avg. peak latency of 3.3 ms). However, high levels of stimulation evoked a bimodal distribution with the addition of a late latency response peak (avg. peak latency of 7.1 ms). For the VCN, in contrast, electrical stimulation elicited multiunit responses that were usually unimodal and had a latency similar to the DCN's late response. Local field potentials (LFP) from the IC showed components that correlated with early and late multiunit responses. Surgical cuts to sever the output of the DCN, the dorsal acoustic stria (DAS), gave insight into the origin of these early and late responses. Cuts eliminated early responses but had little-to-no effect on late responses. The early responses thus originate from cells that project through the DAS, such as DCN's pyramidal and giant cells. Late responses likely arise from the spread of stimulation from a DCN-placed electrode array to the VCN and could originate in bushy and/or stellate cells. In human ABI users, the spread of stimulation in the CN may result in abnormal response patterns that could hinder performance.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 412
页数:22
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI)
    Stephen McInturff
    Florent-Valéry Coen
    Ariel E. Hight
    Osama Tarabichi
    Vivek V. Kanumuri
    Nicolas Vachicouras
    Stéphanie P. Lacour
    Daniel J. Lee
    M. Christian Brown
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2022, 23 : 391 - 412
  • [2] Sensitivity to Pulse Rate and Amplitude Modulation in an Animal Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI)
    McInturff, Stephen
    Adenis, Victor
    Coen, Florent-Valery
    Lacour, Stephanie P.
    Lee, Daniel J. J.
    Brown, M. Christian
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 24 (03): : 365 - 384
  • [3] Sensitivity to Pulse Rate and Amplitude Modulation in an Animal Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI)
    Stephen McInturff
    Victor Adenis
    Florent-Valéry Coen
    Stéphanie P. Lacour
    Daniel J. Lee
    M. Christian Brown
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2023, 24 : 365 - 384
  • [4] Artificial Neural Network Analysis of Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses for Prediction of Active Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) Electrodes in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type II
    Fatima, Nida
    Rock, Jordan
    Galvin, John
    Peng, Kevin
    Barnard, Zachary
    Lekovic, Gregory
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 69 : 180 - 180
  • [5] Noise masking in cochlear synaptopathy: auditory brainstem response vs. auditory nerve response in mouse
    Suthakar, Kirupa
    Liberman, M. Charles
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 127 (06) : 1574 - 1585
  • [6] On the Single Sweep Processing of Auditory Brainstem Responses: Click vs. Chirp Stimulations and Active vs. Passive Electrodes
    Corona-Strauss, Farah I.
    Delb, Wolfgang
    Bloching, Marc
    Strauss, Daniel J.
    2008 30TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 4166 - +
  • [7] Phenomenological model of auditory nerve population responses to cochlear implant stimulation
    Tabibi, Sonia
    Boulet, Jason
    Dillier, Norbert
    Bruce, Ian C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2021, 358
  • [8] Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison
    Causon, Andrew
    O'Driscoll, Martin
    Stapleton, Emma
    Lloyd, Simon
    Freeman, Simon
    Munro, Kevin J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [9] A fast, stochastic, and adaptive model of auditory nerve responses to cochlear implant stimulation
    van Gendt, M. J.
    Briaire, J. J.
    Kalkman, R. K.
    Frijns, J. H. M.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 341 : 130 - 143
  • [10] Optoacoustically induced auditory brainstem responses in the mouse model enhanced through an absorbing film
    Sorg, Katharina
    Heimann, Larissa
    Lana, Gabriela Moreira
    Langenbucher, Achim
    Schick, Bernhard
    Arzt, Eduard
    Wenzel, Gentiana Ioana
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2021, 26 (09)