What publishers can take away from the latest early career researcher research

被引:8
|
作者
Nicholas, David [1 ]
Watkinson, Anthony [2 ]
Abrizah, Abdullah [2 ,3 ]
Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa [4 ]
Xu, Jie [1 ]
Rodriguez-Bravo, Blanca [5 ]
Swigon, Marzena [6 ]
Herman, Eti [7 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] CIBER Res Ltd, Newbury RG14 7RU, Berks, England
[3] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[4] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
[5] Univ Leon, Bibliotecon & Documentac, E-24071 Leon, Castilla Y Leon, Spain
[6] Uniwersytet Warminsko Mazurski, Wydzial Humanistyczny, Oczapowskiego 2, PL-10719 Olsztyn, Poland
[7] Univ Haifa, Informat & Lib Studies Programme, Haifa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1002/leap.1165
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Key points Early career researchers (ECRs) consider journals the central form of communication – but are concerned about pressure to publish. ECRs want to share but currently accept the closed publishing system because of the need to build a traditional reputation. ECRs know – and appear to care – little about publishers but trust them as publishing and reviewing facilitators. Editors are criticized for not managing peer review with better selection of reviewers. Megajournals are not seen as the future journal form and criticized for lack of selectivity. ECRs want open access/science in principle but are circumspect about their contribution to it. ResearchGate is a key force for change as ECRs consider it a mainstay communication and reputation platform. © 2018 The Author(s). Learned Publishing © 2018 ALPSP.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 253
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条