Comparative pharmacokinetics of two different formulations of efavirenz

被引:0
|
作者
Ferrari, I [1 ]
Mahler, EB [1 ]
Iglesias, AM [1 ]
Giannone, C [1 ]
Fridman, D [1 ]
Serrano, JL [1 ]
Ortiz, M [1 ]
Zini, E [1 ]
Lazovski, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ CAECE, Lab Bioequivalence & Mol Biol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The use of generic drugs assumes importance given the increasing availability of antiretroviral therapy in developing countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of a NNRTI. efavirenz, manufactured by a local drug company (T - Virorrever(R), Richmond Laboratories) against the innovator pharmaceutical product (R - Stocrim(TM), Merck). Pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC (0-->infinity) AUC (0-->144h), Cmax, Tmax and T-1/2 were determined from plasma concentrations of 18 healthy volunteers by means of a randomized two-way crossover design for 200mg tablets of both formulations. Geometric averages (antilogarithmic) and 90% confidence intervals for AUC (0-->infinity), AUC (0-->144h) and Cmax were 0.9890 (0.8010-1.2210), 1.0014 (0.8653-1.1589) and 0.9348 (0.8196-1.0661) respectively, satisfying the 80-125% bioequivalence range accepted by the FDA, the EMEA and the WHO guidances. Bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation can be concluded.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 245
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacokinetics of topically applied metronidazole in two different formulations
    Dykes, P
    Hill, S
    Marks, R
    SKIN PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 10 (01): : 28 - 33
  • [2] Comparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of amoxicillin: Bioequivalence assessment
    Sailer, Reinhard
    Arnold, Peter
    Erenmemisoglu, Aydin
    Martin, Wolfgang
    Tamur, Uygur
    Kanzik, Ilker
    Hincal, A. Atilla
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2007, 57 (04): : 227 - 231
  • [3] Comparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of losartan: Bioequivalence assessment
    Tamimi, JJI
    Salem, II
    Alam, SM
    Zaman, Q
    Dham, R
    BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 2005, 26 (05) : 205 - 210
  • [4] Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of two fenofibrate capsule formulations in healthy volunteers
    Vlase, Laurian
    Popa, Adina
    Muntean, Dana
    Leucuta, Sorin E.
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2010, 60 (09): : 560 - 563
  • [5] Comparative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two different sertraline formulations
    Almeida, S
    Portolés, A
    Terleira, A
    Filipe, A
    Cea, E
    Caturla, MC
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2005, 55 (04): : 191 - 197
  • [6] Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two different landiolol formulations in a healthy Caucasian group
    Krumpl, Guenther
    Ulc, Ivan
    Trebs, Michaela
    Kadlecova, Pavla
    Hodisch, Juri
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 92 : 64 - 73
  • [7] A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of two different formulations of extended-release niacin
    Lauring, B.
    Rosko, K.
    Luo, W. -L.
    Wenning, L.
    Kissling, J.
    Roupe, K.
    Paolini, J. F.
    Wagner, J.
    Lai, E.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [8] Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of four alkaloids in different formulations from Corydalis decumbens
    Wu, Chunzhen
    Yan, Renjie
    Zhang, Rongjin
    Bai, Fan
    Yang, Yifang
    Wu, Zhaoyang
    Wu, Anming
    JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 149 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [9] COMPARATIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 DOXEPIN FORMULATIONS
    WECKER, MT
    WOODWORTH, JR
    HINSVARK, ON
    AMSEL, LP
    ROTENBERG, KS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 25 (06): : 461 - 461
  • [10] Comparative pharmacokinetics of two florfenicol formulations following intramuscular and subcutaneous administration to sheep
    Balcomb, Christie C.
    Angelos, John A.
    Chigerwe, Munashe
    Byrne, Barbara A.
    Lane, V. Michael
    Wetzlich, Scott E.
    Sahin, Orhan
    Holler, Larry
    Zhang, Shuping
    Tell, Lisa A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2018, 79 (01) : 107 - 114