The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis

被引:308
|
作者
Gelfand, Michele J. [1 ]
Jackson, Joshua Conrad [4 ]
Pan, Xinyue [1 ]
Nau, Dana [2 ,3 ]
Pieper, Dylan [1 ]
Denison, Emmy [1 ]
Dagher, Munqith [5 ]
Van Lange, Paul A. M. [6 ]
Chiu, Chi-Yue [7 ]
Wang, Mo [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Comp Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Inst Syst Res, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Al Mustakilla Res Grp, Amman, Jordan
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Brain & Behav, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Social Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH | 2021年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
SOCIAL NORMS; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms-or cultural tightness-looseness-was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive. Methods We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness-looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate. Findings The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4.99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8.71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups cooperate much faster under threat and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat. Interpretation Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:e135 / e144
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条