How affordable housing becomes more sustainable? A stakeholder study

被引:96
|
作者
Gan, Xiaolong [1 ]
Zuo, Jian [2 ]
Wu, Peng [3 ]
Wang, Jun [3 ]
Chang, Ruidong [4 ]
Wen, Tao [5 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Sch Cultural & Social Dev, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, ECIC, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Dept Construct Management, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Southwest Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;
关键词
Affordable housing; Sustainability; Stakeholders; Urbanization; China; TRAGEDY; CHALLENGES; CONSTRUCTION; COMMONS; CHINA; KEY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization poses a significant challenge of accommodating the poor, particularly in developing countries such as China where affordable housing has only been initiated a few years ago and will continue to be developed in the coming years. Two major considerations in affordable housing programs are cost and time, as the ability to meet the needs of low-income households is the main target of these programs. However, it is not a common strategy to address affordable housing shortage by means of incorporating sustainability features. One of critical issues is the lack of sustainability framework to integrate sustainability in affordable housing. This paper aims to identify the key sustainability performance indicators (KSPIs) which are useful to guide the development of affordable housing. A preliminary list of 42 key sustainability performance indicators of affordable housing was identified through an extensive literature review. This was followed by a questionnaire survey to solicit the professional views from three stakeholder groups, namely government, developers and academics in the Chinese construction industry. Via the fuzzy set theory and variance analysis, 24 KSPIs were finally highlighted. These findings provide useful references for policy makers as well as industry practitioners to develop affordable housing programs in a sustainable manner. This helps to achieve the sustainable development at the regional scale. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 437
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Affordable Is HUD Affordable Housing?
    Hamidi, Shima
    Ewing, Reid
    Renne, John
    HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 2016, 26 (03) : 437 - 455
  • [2] Affordable and Sustainable Housing in Rwanda
    Egenti, Clement
    Khatib, Jamal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [3] HIGH TECHNOLOGY BECOMES MORE REFINED AND AFFORDABLE
    不详
    PLASTICS TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 29 (09) : 18 - &
  • [4] TRIPLE REDUNDANT CONTROL BECOMES MORE AFFORDABLE
    BLICKLEY, GJ
    CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1993, 40 (10) : 95 - 96
  • [5] How (Not) to Allocate Affordable Housing
    Arnosti, Nick
    Shi, Peng
    AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 109 : 204 - 208
  • [6] How (Not) to Allocate Affordable Housing
    Arnosti, Nick
    Shi, Peng
    EC'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND COMPUTATION, 2017, : 679 - 679
  • [7] The sustainable and affordable housing debate in Australia
    Zillante, George
    Arman, Michael
    Davidson, Kathryn
    Wilson, Lou
    Pullen, Stephen
    Zuo, Jian
    CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 456 - 463
  • [8] Achieving sustainable construction in affordable housing
    Ternes, MP
    Barcik, MK
    Creech, DB
    THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF THE EXTERIOR ENVELOPES OF BUILDINGS VII, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 217 - 226
  • [9] SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    Nair, Deepa G.
    IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE IDEAS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 1229 - 1234
  • [10] Housing providers' insights on the benefits of sustainable affordable housing
    Olanrewaju, AbdulLateef
    Tan, Seong Yeow
    Abdul-Aziz, Abdul-Rashid
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 26 (06) : 847 - 858