Radiographic abnormalities among construction workers exposed to quartz containing dust

被引:21
|
作者
Nij, ET
Burdorf, A
Parker, J
Attfield, M
van Duivenbooden, C
Heederik, D
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Inst Risk Assessment Sci, Div Environm & Occupat Hlth, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] W Virginia Univ, Dept Med, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[4] NIOSH, Div Resp Dis Studies, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[5] Arbouw Fdn, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1136/oem.60.6.410
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Construction workers are exposed to quartz containing respirable dust, at levels that may cause fibrosis in the lungs. Studies so far have not established a dose-response relation for radiographic abnormalities for this occupational group. Aims: To measure the extent of radiographic abnormalities among construction workers primarily exposed to quartz containing respirable dust. Methods: A cross sectional study on radiographic abnormalities indicative of pneumoconiosis was conducted among 1339 construction workers mainly involved in grinding, (jack)-hammering, drilling, cutting, sawing, and polishing. Radiological abnormalities were determined by median results of the 1980 International Labour Organisation system of three certified "B" readers. Questionnaires were used for assessment of occupational history, presence of respiratory diseases, and symptoms and smoking habits. Results: An abnormality of ILO profusion category 1/0 and greater was observed on 10.2% of the chest radiographs, and profusion category of 1/1 or greater on 2.9% of the radiographs. The average duration of exposure of this group was 19 years and the average age was 42. The predominant type of small opacities (irregularly shaped) is presumably indicative of mixed dust pneumoconiosis. The prevalence of early signs of nodular silicosis (small rounded opacities of category 1/0 or greater) was low (0.8%). Conclusions: The study suggests an elevated risk of radiographic abnormalities among these workers with expected high exposure. An association between radiographic abnormalities and cumulative exposure to quartz containing dust from construction sites was observed, after correction for potentially confounding variables.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 417
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] RADIOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIES IN VERMONT GRANITE WORKERS EXPOSED TO LOW-LEVELS OF GRANITE DUST
    BANKS, DE
    LAPP, NL
    CHEST, 1991, 100 (06) : 1482 - 1483
  • [3] Radiographic abnormalities among Finnish construction, shipyard and asbestos industry workers
    Tossavainen, A
    Huuskonen, MS
    Koskinen, K
    Roto, P
    Zitting, A
    ADVANCES IN THE PREVENTION OF OCCUPATIONAL RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 1998, 1153 : 290 - 294
  • [4] Radiographic abnormalities among Finnish construction, shipyard and asbestos industry workers
    Koskinen, K
    Zitting, A
    Tossavainen, A
    Rinne, JP
    Roto, P
    Kivekas, J
    Reijula, K
    Huuskonen, MS
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1998, 24 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [5] RESPIRATORY ABNORMALITIES IN WORKERS EXPOSED TO GRAIN DUST
    TSE, KS
    WARREN, P
    JANUSZ, M
    MCCARTHY, DS
    CHERNIACK, RM
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1973, 27 (02): : 74 - 77
  • [6] Increased mortality in COPD among construction workers exposed to inorganic dust
    Bergdahl, IA
    Torén, K
    Eriksson, K
    Hedlund, U
    Nilsson, T
    Flodin, R
    Järvholm, B
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (03) : 402 - 406
  • [8] Radiographic abnormalities in silica-exposed workers - Reply
    Graham, WGB
    Vacek, PM
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2002, 44 (04) : 308 - 309
  • [9] BIOCHEMICAL-ABNORMALITIES IN WORKERS EXPOSED TO MOLYBDENUM DUST
    WALRAVENS, PA
    MOUREERASO, R
    SOLOMONS, CC
    CHAPPELL, WR
    BENTLEY, G
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1979, 34 (05): : 302 - 308
  • [10] Risk assessment of silicosis and lung cancer among construction workers exposed to respirable quartz
    Nij, ET
    Heederik, D
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2005, 31 : 49 - 56