Inequities in first education policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis: A comparative analysis in four Central and East European countries

被引:8
|
作者
Mitescu-Manea, M. [1 ]
Safta-Zecheria, L. [2 ]
Neumann, E. [3 ]
Bodrug-Lungu, V [4 ]
Milenkova, V [5 ]
Lendzhova, V [5 ]
机构
[1] West Univ Timisoara, Dept Educ, Blvd Vasile Parvan 4, Timisoara 300223, Romania
[2] West Univ Timisoara, Educ Sci Dept, Timisoara, Romania
[3] MTA Ctr Excellence, Ctr Social Sci, 100,POB 340, H-1476 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Moldova State Univ, Dept Educ Sci, Kishinev, Moldova
[5] South West Univ Neofit Rilski, Sociol Dept, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
来源
EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2021年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
Inequity; education policy; COVID-19; digital poverty; distance education; policy discourse; spatio-temporality; CULTURAL-POLITICAL ECONOMY; SCHOOL CLOSURES;
D O I
10.1177/14749041211030077
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The historically high inequities in the education systems of Central and East-European countries have been further exacerbated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using critical frame analysis, we compared the education policy debates in Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Republic of Moldova during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic with a particular focus on inequities. We discuss the policy frames proposed and utilized by governmental and non-governmental actors to understand their roles played in articulating policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis, and highlight the specificities and commonalities of the political language within and across the national borders of the four countries. We conclude with our findings on the dynamics and structure of the policy debate between state and non-state actors in times of crisis with a particular focus on policy spaces and policy temporalities. Two ways of constructing spatio-temporalities co-exist: one is national, state and public health centric and focuses on governing 'through' the crisis; and the other is focused on long term planning while constructing the crisis as an opportunity for decisive intervention towards more equitable education.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 563
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 policy analysis for 10 European countries
    Yoshiyasu Takefuji
    Journal of Public Health, 2024, 32 : 17 - 24
  • [2] COVID-19 policy analysis for 10 European countries
    Takefuji, Yoshiyasu
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 32 (01): : 17 - 24
  • [3] Disproportionate policy dynamics in crisis and uncertainty: an international comparative analysis of policy responses to COVID-19
    Shafi, Saahir
    Mallinson, Daniel J.
    POLICY STUDIES, 2023, 44 (01) : 90 - 111
  • [4] The COVID-19 crisis and policy responses by continental European welfare states
    Cantillon, Bea
    Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin
    van der Veen, Romke
    SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 55 (02) : 326 - 338
  • [5] Responses to COVID-19 Social and Economic Impacts: A Comparative Analysis in Southern European Countries
    Casquilho-Martins, Ines
    Belchior-Rocha, Helena
    SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [6] COVID-19 and ASEAN responses: Comparative policy analysis
    Djalante, Riyanti
    Nurhidayah, Laely
    Hoang Van Minh
    Phuong, Nguyen Thi Ngoc
    Mahendradhata, Yodi
    Trias, Angelo
    Lassa, Jonatan
    Miller, Michelle Ann
    PROGRESS IN DISASTER SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [7] East Central Europe in the COVID-19 crisis
    Bohle, Dorothee
    Eihmanis, Edgars
    EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2022, 38 (04) : 491 - 506
  • [8] Government Responses to COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of Visegrad Countries
    Koca, Zafer
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2022, 20 (01) : 57 - 84
  • [9] European SMEs amidst the COVID-19 crisis: assessing impact and policy responses
    Juergensen, Jill
    Guimon, Jose
    Narula, Rajneesh
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (03): : 499 - 510
  • [10] European SMEs amidst the COVID-19 crisis: assessing impact and policy responses
    Jill Juergensen
    José Guimón
    Rajneesh Narula
    Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 2020, 47 : 499 - 510