How the Big 4 got big: Audit culture and the metamorphosis of international accountancy firms

被引:14
|
作者
Shore, Cris [1 ]
Wright, Susan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Anthropol, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Aarhus Univ, Danish Sch Educ, Educ Anthropol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Danish Sch Educ, CHEF, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Anthropology; audit culture; Big; 4; calculative practices; capitalism; international accountancy firms; professional identity;
D O I
10.1177/0308275X18775815
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
New calculative techniques of management and accountancy are having a transformative effect on organisations, individuals and society. These processes are often associated with contemporary neoliberal capitalism, but what exactly is driving the proliferation of these measurement systems and how is this change actually occurring? We address these questions by exploring the history of the Big 4 international accountancy firms and their role in spreading audit culture and the rationalities of financial accountancy. Since the 1990s, the expansion of their remit from traditional auditing to a growing emphasis on consultancy services has increasingly blurred the boundary between their public watchdog role and their commercial interests. Combined with the changing values, career trajectories and habitus' of audit company professionals, and the weaknesses of self-regulation, this has resulted in problems for ethics and corporate social responsibility. Using ethnographic examples, we examine the metamorphosis that occurs as accountants, originally trained in the disciplines of financial probity, become more entrepreneurially oriented when they ascend to senior positions as company managers and partners. If the calculative practices of accountancy are central to modern forms of audit, we argue they are also transforming accountancy firms themselves into evermore calculative and financialised entities. We conclude by showing how the post-1990s shift from auditing to advisory services leads these companies to tread an ever-finer line between entrepreneurship and fraud.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 324
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Corrupt Are Universities? Audit Culture, Fraud Prevention, and the Big Four Accountancy Firms
    Shore, Cris
    CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2018, 59 : S92 - S104
  • [2] How Big-4 Firms Improve Audit Quality
    Che, Limei
    Hope, Ole-Kristian
    Langli, John Christian
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (10) : 4552 - 4572
  • [3] Tax haven networks and the role of the Big 4 accountancy firms
    Jones, Chris
    Temouri, Yama
    Cobham, Alex
    JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2018, 53 (02) : 177 - 193
  • [4] Tax Aggressiveness and Big4 Audit Firms
    Hartmann, Carta Furtado
    Martinez, Antonio Lopo
    REUNIR-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO CONTABILIDADE E SUSTENTABILIDADE, 2020, 10 (03): : 37 - 46
  • [5] Investigating audit quality among Big 4 Malaysian firms
    Carlin, Tyrone M.
    Finch, Nigel
    Laili, Nur Hidayah
    ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2009, 17 (02) : 96 - 114
  • [6] Are the Big 4 audit firms homogeneous? Further evidence from audit pricing
    Hrazdil, Karel
    Simunic, Dan A.
    Suwanyangyuan, Nattavut
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2020, 24 (03) : 347 - 365
  • [7] How lizards got their big feet
    不详
    NATURE, 2018, 560 (7716) : 5 - 5
  • [8] The Use of Business Risk Audit Perspectives by Non-Big 4 Audit Firms
    van Buuren, Joost
    Koch, Christopher
    Amerongen, Niels van Nieuw
    Wright, Arnold M.
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (03): : 105 - 128
  • [9] Audit Market Response to PCAOB Censures of US Big 4 Firms
    Boone, Jeff P.
    Khurana, Inder K.
    Raman, K. K.
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2019, 28 (04) : 621 - 658
  • [10] Strategic pricing by Big 4 audit firms in private client segments
    Dutillieux, Wouter
    Stokes, Donald
    Willekens, Marleen
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2013, 53 (04): : 961 - 994