Dual entrenchment and tax management: Classified boards and family firms

被引:21
|
作者
Moore, Jared A. [1 ]
Suh, SangHyun. [2 ]
Werner, Edward M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Business, 443 Austin Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Manning Sch Business, 218 Pasteur Hall,One Univ Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Business, 215 Business & Sci Bldg,227 Penn St, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
关键词
Tax management; Tax avoidance; Entrenchment; Classified boards; Family firms; Institutional investors; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDERS; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; EQUITY OWNERSHIP; AGENCY; AGGRESSIVENESS; AVOIDANCE; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines whether and how multiple managerial entrenchment devices within a firm, specifically the structure of the board of directors and family firm status, interact to influence tax management. Using a sample of 4,000 U.S. public firm-year observations covering the period 1999-2013, we find that the classified board structure and family firm status are both negatively related with tax avoidance. However, accounting for the interaction between board structure and family firm status, we also find that the negative associations between both entrenchment measures and tax management apply only where the other entrenchment mechanism is absent. In further analysis, we find that higher levels of monitoring by institutional investors neutralize the interaction between the presence of a classified board and family firm status. Our evidence highlights that governance/monitoring mechanisms can interact in complex ways, including an offsetting effect between potentially redundant dual-level entrenchment mechanisms, to influence tax management behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 172
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classified boards, firm value, and managerial entrenchment
    Faleye, Olubunmi
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 83 (02) : 501 - 529
  • [2] Management entrenchment and the valuation discount of dual class firms
    Baulkaran, Vishaal
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2014, 54 (01): : 70 - 81
  • [3] Tax aggressiveness in family firms and the non-linear entrenchment effect
    Mafrolla, Elisabetta
    D'Amico, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY, 2016, 7 (03) : 178 - 184
  • [4] Entrenchment vs long-term benefits: classified boards and CSR
    Cullinan, Charles P.
    Mahoney, Lois
    Roush, Pamela B.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2019, 10 (01) : 69 - 86
  • [5] Family firms and crash risk: Alignment and entrenchment effects
    Srinidhi, Bin
    Liao, Qunfeng
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2020, 16 (02)
  • [6] Boards of directors in family firms: a generational perspective
    Yannick Bammens
    Wim Voordeckers
    Anita Van Gils
    Small Business Economics, 2008, 31 : 163 - 180
  • [7] Female-friendly boards in family firms
    Wang, Joyce C.
    Zhao, Yiyi
    Sun, Sunny L.
    Zhu, Jigao
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 157
  • [8] Boards of directors in family firms: a generational perspective
    Bammens, Yannick
    Voordeckers, Wim
    Van Gils, Anita
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2008, 31 (02) : 163 - 180
  • [9] Calibrating management control technologies and the dual identity of family firms
    El Masri, Tarek
    Tekathen, Matthaus
    Magnan, Michel
    Boulianne, Emilio
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 14 (02): : 157 - 188
  • [10] Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?
    Chen, Shuping
    Chen, Xia
    Cheng, Qiang
    Shevlin, Terry
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 95 (01) : 41 - 61