Strategies for mitigating methane emissions from livestock - Australian options and opportunities

被引:0
|
作者
Hegarty, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, NSW Agr Beef Ind Ctr, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
关键词
selection; efficiency; rumen; diet; ruminant;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Methane produced by enteric fermentation within the digestive tract of sheep and cattle is the largest source of agricultural methane emissions in Australia and contributes 13.2 % of total national greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing emissions from this sector by nutritional management, animal selection and rumen modification are possible, but require a long-term research and development commitment. While rumen modification and animal selection offer direct tools to reduce daily methane emissions from domestic ruminants, feed management does not offer such a simple solution to achieve reduced annual methane emissions from the livestock sector. A continual focus on the improved production efficiency resulting from improved diet digestibility (g methane/g product) is considered unhelpful in achieving reduced emissions from the sector unless incentives to decrease livestock numbers are also implemented. An array of opportunities for animal selection and rumen modification are discussed and their development is recommended to create 'enviromnent-friendly' livestock.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies
    Key, Nigel
    Tallard, Gregoire
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 112 (02) : 387 - 414
  • [2] Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies
    Nigel Key
    Gregoire Tallard
    Climatic Change, 2012, 112 : 387 - 414
  • [3] Methane emissions from Australian livestock: implications of the Kyoto Protocol
    Howden, SM
    Reyenga, PJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1999, 50 (08): : 1285 - 1291
  • [4] Mitigating methane emissions and promoting acetogenesis in ruminant livestock
    Mrutu, Rehema Iddi
    Abdussamad, Abdussamad Muhammad
    Umar, Kabir Mustapha
    Abdulhamid, Adnan
    Farny, Natalie G.
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2025, 6
  • [5] Air emissions of ammonia and methane from livestock operations:: Valuation and policy options
    Shih, Jhih-Shyang
    Burtraw, Dallas
    Palmer, Karen
    Siikamaki, Juha
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2008, 58 (09): : 1117 - 1129
  • [6] Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review
    Gerber, P. J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H.
    Oh, J.
    Lee, C.
    Meinen, R.
    Montes, F.
    Ott, T.
    Firkins, J.
    Rotz, A.
    Dell, C.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W. Z.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Oosting, S.
    ANIMAL, 2013, 7 : 220 - 234
  • [7] Policy options to manage greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock sector: An Australian perspective
    Ugalde, David
    van Vliet, Jane
    McGregor, Anthony
    Slattery, Bill
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2008, 48 (1-2) : VII - XII
  • [8] Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies
    Dario Caro
    Ermias Kebreab
    Frank M. Mitloehner
    Climatic Change, 2016, 137 : 467 - 480
  • [9] Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies
    Caro, Dario
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Mitloehner, Frank M.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 137 (3-4) : 467 - 480
  • [10] Livestock GRACEnet: A Workgroup Dedicated to Evaluating and Mitigating Emissions from Livestock Production
    Leytem, April B.
    Dungan, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (04) : 1101 - 1110