Toehold Acquisitions as Behavioral Real Options

被引:3
|
作者
Smit, Han T. J. [1 ,2 ]
Kil, Joris C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Corp Finance, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, ERIM, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Monitor Deloitte, Amsterdam office, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
acquisitions; decision making; psychology; real options theory; minority stakes; PERCEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY; CEO OVERCONFIDENCE; UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; CONFIRMATION BIAS; COGNITIVE BIASES; DECISION-MAKING; TIME-PRESSURE; MARKET; RISK; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/0008125617712255
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Dealmakers tend to neglect uncertainty when making acquisition decisions, rushing into deals that eventually fail to deliver the anticipated synergies. Cause for this uncertainty neglect can be found in behavioral biases that cloud executive decision making. Acquirers should more often use minority stakes as a toehold to test full acquisitions and to guard themselves against the negative effects of uncertainty. An extended valuation toolkit that requires more managerial attention to uncertainty and behavioral pitfalls can help executives to better identify and value the benefits of minority stake strategies as an alternative to controlling acquisitions in uncertain situations.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 73
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条