Effectiveness and Factors Associated with Epidural Decompression and Adhesiolysis Using a Balloon-Inflatable Catheter in Chronic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 1-Year Follow-Up

被引:20
|
作者
Choi, Seong-Soo [1 ]
Lee, Jong-Hyuk [1 ]
Kim, Doohwan [1 ]
Kim, Hyun Kyu [1 ]
Lee, Sohee [1 ]
Song, Kyo Joon [2 ]
Park, Jin Kyu [3 ]
Shim, Jae Hang [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Vet Hlth Serv Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Himchan Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Inchon, South Korea
[4] Hanyang Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Guri Hosp, Sch Med, Gyeongchun Ro 153, Guri Si 471701, Gyunggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Chronic Pain; Lumbar; Radiculopathy; Low Back Pain; Balloon Decompression; LUMBOSACRAL RADICULAR PAIN; LOW-BACK-PAIN; PERCUTANEOUS ADHESIOLYSIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY; FORAMINAL STENOSIS; SURGERY SYNDROME; NERVE ROOT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pnv018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Design. An institutional single-armed prospective observational study. Subjects. Chronic refractory lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods. This study was performed in 61 patients with spinal stenosis who suffered from chronic (at least 3 months) lumbar radicular pain with or without lower back pain. Patients had failed to maintain improvement for more than 1 month with conventional epidural injection. The numeric rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were each measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis and balloon decompression with a ZiNeu catheter. Results. The percentage of successful responders was 72.1%, 60.7%, 57.4%, and 36.1% of patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. A single combined treatment of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis and balloon decompression with a ZiNeu catheter provided sufficient pain relief and functional improvement in patients with chronic refractory lumbar spinal stenosis, and the improvement was maintained for 12 months (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that absence of diabetes independently predicted successful response at 12 months after percutaneous epidural decompression and adhesiolysis with the balloon catheter (Odds ratio = 0.080; 95% confidence interval = 0.009-0.676; P = 0.020). Conclusions. The combined epidural adhesiolysis and balloon decompression with a ZiNeu catheter led to significant pain relief and functional improvement in a subset of patients with refractory spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 487
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Percutaneous Epidural Adhesiolysis Using Inflatable Balloon Catheter and Balloon-less Catheter in Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Karm, Myong-Hwan
    Choi, Seong-Soo
    Kim, Doo-Hwan
    Park, Jun-Young
    Lee, Sukyung
    Park, Jin Kyu
    Suh, Young Joong
    Leem, Jeong-Gil
    Shin, Jin Woo
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2018, 21 (06) : 593 - 605
  • [2] mild Interlaminar Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Procedure Description and Case Series With 1-year Follow-up
    Wong, Wade H. M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (06): : 534 - 538
  • [3] Indirect decompression with lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: minimum 1-year MRI follow-up
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 33 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Compared With Transforaminal Route Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal stenosis: Minimum 1-year Follow-up
    Sun, Weixiang
    Wang, Jie
    Hu, Yafei
    Tao, Jinzhuo
    Yang, Chengwu
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2025, 18 : 1071 - 1080
  • [5] Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up
    Karlsson, T.
    Forsth, P.
    Skorpil, M.
    Pazarlis, K.
    Ohagen, P.
    Michaelsson, K.
    Sanden, B.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (12): : 1343 - 1351
  • [6] What is the treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at 1-year follow-up?
    Held, Ulrike
    Steurer, Johann
    Pichierri, Giuseppe
    Wertli, Maria M.
    Farshad, Mazda
    Brunner, Florian
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Porchet, Francois
    Fekete, Tamas F.
    Schmid, Urs D.
    Gravestock, Isaac
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [7] Transforaminal epidural steroid injection in lumbar spinal stenosis: an observational study with two-year follow-up
    Davis, Niel
    Hourigan, Patrick
    Clarke, Andrew
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 31 (02) : 205 - 208
  • [8] Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression versus Open Decompression and Fusion Surgery for the Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study
    Song, Qingpeng
    Zhu, Bin
    Zhao, Wenkui
    Liang, Chen
    Hai, Bao
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 1331 - 1338
  • [9] Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum 1-Year Follow-up
    Choi, Sang-Soo
    Ahn, Geon
    Jang, Il-Tae
    Kim, Hyeun Sung
    NEUROSURGERY PRACTICE, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [10] Results of Decompression Alone in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
    Ha, Dae-Ho
    Kim, Tae-Kyun
    Oh, Sung-Kyun
    Cho, Hyung-Gyu
    Kim, Keon-Rok
    Shim, Dae-Moo
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 187 - 193