The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on the Employment and Functioning of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review

被引:40
|
作者
Nevala, Nina [1 ]
Pehkonen, Irmeli [1 ]
Teittinen, Antti [2 ]
Vesala, Hannu T. [2 ]
Portfors, Pia [3 ]
Anttila, Heidi [3 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, POB 40, Tyoterveyslaitos 00032, Finland
[2] Finnish Assoc Intellectual & Dev Disabil, Viljatie 4 A, Helsinki 007004, Finland
[3] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, POB 30, Helsinki 00271, Finland
关键词
Employment; Intellectual Disability; Developmental Disability; Learning Disability; Rehabilitation; Systematic review; Barriers; Facilitators; YOUNG-ADULTS; POST-SCHOOL; POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION; SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT; SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; POSTSCHOOL OUTCOMES; MENTAL-RETARDATION; TRANSITION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-019-09837-2
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose This systematic review analyzed the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on the employment and functioning of people with intellectual disabilities (ID), as well as barriers and facilitators of employment. Methods This was a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. The outcomes were employment, transition to the open labor market and functioning. The review included qualitative studies of employment barriers and facilitators. The population comprised people with ID aged 16-68 years. Peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 1990 and February 2019 were obtained from the databases Cinahl, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Eric, Medic, Medline, OTseeker, Pedro, PsycInfo, PubMed, Socindex, and the Web of Science. We also searched Google Scholar and Base. The modified selection instrument (PIOS: participants, intervention, outcome, and study design) used in the selection of the articles depended on the selection criteria. Results Ten quantitative (one randomized controlled, one concurrently controlled, and eight cohort studies), six qualitative studies, one multimethod study, and 21 case studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative studies showed that secondary education increases employment among people with ID when it includes work experience and personal support services. Supported employment also increased employment in the open labor market, which sheltered work did not. The barriers to employment were the use of sheltered work, discrimination in vocational experience, the use of class teaching, and deficient work experience while still at school. The facilitators of employment were one's own activity, the support of one's family, job coaching, a well-designed work environment, appreciation of one's work, support form one's employer and work organization, knowledge and experience of employment during secondary education, and for entrepreneurs, the use of a support person. Conclusions The employment of people with ID can be improved through secondary education including proper teaching methods and personal support services, the use of supported work, workplace accommodations and support from one's family and employer. These results can be utilized in the development of rehabilitation, education, and the employment of people with ID, to allow them the opportunity to work in the open labor market and participate in society.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 802
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on the Employment and Functioning of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review
    Nina Nevala
    Irmeli Pehkonen
    Antti Teittinen
    Hannu T. Vesala
    Pia Pörtfors
    Heidi Anttila
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2019, 29 : 773 - 802
  • [2] SOCIAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
    Krysta, K.
    Krysta, J.
    Klasik, A.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29
  • [3] A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for people with intellectual disabilities and dementia
    Muralidhar, Malvika
    Spector, Aimee
    Hui, Esther K.
    Liu, Lisa
    Ali, Afia
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 28 (03) : 385 - 395
  • [4] Psychosocial interventions for people with intellectual disabilities and dementia: A systematic review
    MacDonald, Steven
    Summers, S. J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 33 (05) : 839 - 855
  • [5] The association between employment and the health of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Robertson, Janet
    Beyer, Steve
    Emerson, Eric
    Baines, Susannah
    Hatton, Chris
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 32 (06) : 1335 - 1348
  • [6] The effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for people with learning disabilities: a systematic review
    James, Chris
    Stacey, James
    TIZARD LEARNING DISABILITY REVIEW, 2013, 19 (01) : 17 - +
  • [7] Self-management interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Sandjojo, Janice
    Eltringham, Emma G.
    Gebhardt, Winifred A.
    Zedlitz, Aglaia M. E. E.
    Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (10) : 1983 - 1996
  • [8] The effectiveness of interventions for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities with dementia
    Alsagoff, S.
    Triantafyllopoulou, P.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (7-8) : 769 - 769
  • [9] Commentary on "The effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for people with learning disabilities: a systematic review"
    Brown, Hilary
    TIZARD LEARNING DISABILITY REVIEW, 2013, 19 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [10] A systematic review of the effects of motor interventions to improve motor, cognitive, and/or social functioning in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities
    Houwen, Suzanne
    van der Putten, Annette
    Vlaskamp, Carla
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (09) : 2093 - 2116