Lithology and hydrocarbon mapping from multicomponent seismic data

被引:3
|
作者
Ozdemir, Huseyin [1 ]
Flanagan, Kevin [2 ]
Tyler, Emma [1 ]
机构
[1] Gatwick Airport, Reservoir Seism Serv, Crawley RH6 0NZ, England
[2] Maersk Oil N Sea UK Ltd, Aberdeen AB12 3LG, Scotland
关键词
AVO ANALYSIS; QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY; FLUID; GAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00821.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Elastic rock properties can be estimated from prestack seismic data using amplitude variation with offset analysis. P-wave, S-wave and density 'reflectivities', or contrasts, can be inverted from angle-band stacks. The 'reflectivities' are then inverted to absolute acoustic impedance, shear impedance and density. These rock properties can be used to map reservoir parameters through all stages of field development and production. When P-wave contrast is small, or gas clouds obscure reservoir zones, multicomponent ocean-bottom recording of converted-waves (P to S or Ps) data provides reliable mapping of reservoir boundaries. Angle-band stacks of multicomponent P-wave (Pz) and Ps data can also be inverted jointly. In this paper Aki-Richards equations are used without simplifications to invert angle-band stacks to 'reflectivities'. This enables the use of reflection seismic data beyond 30 degrees of incident angles compared to the conventional amplitude variation with offset analysis. It, in turn, provides better shear impedance and density estimates. An important input to amplitude variation with offset analysis is the V(s)/V(p) ratio. Conventional methods use a constant or a time-varying V(s)/V(p) model. Here, a time- and space-varying model is used during the computation of the 'reflectivities'. The V(s)/V(p) model is generated using well log data and picked horizons. For multicomponent data applications, the latter model can also be generated from processing V(s)/V(p) models and available well data. Reservoir rock properties such as lambda, mu, Poisson's ratio and bulk modulus can be computed from acoustic impedance, shear impedance and density for pore fill and lithology identification. lambda and mu are the Lame constants and is density. These estimations can also be used for a more efficient log property mapping. V(p)/V(s) ratio or Poisson's ratio, lambda and weighted stacks, such as the one computed from lambda and lambda/mu, are good gas/oil and oil/water contact indicators, i.e., pore fill indicators, while mu mainly indicates lithology. mu is also affected by pressure changes. Results from a multicomponent data set are used to illustrate mapping of gas, oil and water saturation and lithology in a Tertiary sand/shale setting. Whilst initial log crossplot analysis suggested that pore fill discrimination may be possible, the inversion was not successful in revealing fluid effects. However, rock properties computed from acoustic impedance, shear impedance and density estimates provided good lithology indicators; pore fill identification was less successful. Neural network analysis using computed rock properties provided good indication of sand/shale distribution away from the existing wells and complemented the results depicted from individual rock property inversions.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 306
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HYDROCARBON RECOGNITION FROM SEISMIC DATA
    BARRY, KM
    SHUGART, TR
    GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 38 (06) : 1191 - 1191
  • [2] Bayesian lithology and fluid prediction from seismic prestack data
    Buland, Arild
    Kolbjornsen, Odd
    Hauge, Ragnar
    Skjaeveland, Oyvind
    Duffaut, Kenneth
    GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 73 (03) : C13 - C21
  • [3] Wellbased seismic lithology inversion for porosity and paythickness mapping
    Phillips Petroleum, Bellaire
    TX, United States
    不详
    OK, United States
    Leading Edge, 2 (166-171):
  • [4] Multicomponent seabed seismic improves imaging and prediction of lithology and fluid properties
    Statoil A/S, Norway
    JPT J Pet Technol, 6 (34-35):
  • [5] Multicomponent seabed seismic improves imaging and prediction of lithology and fluid properties
    Amundsen, L
    Arntsen, B
    Kristensen, A
    Rogno, H
    Sollid, A
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 51 (06): : 34 - 35
  • [6] Quantitative lithology prediction from seismic data using deep learning
    Nie, Wenliang
    Gu, Jiayi
    Li, Bo
    Wen, Xiaotao
    Nie, Xiangfei
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2025, 196
  • [7] LITHOLOGY INFORMATION FROM SEISMIC TRACES
    LINDSETH, RO
    GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 38 (01) : 182 - &
  • [8] HOW HYDROCARBON RESERVES ARE ESTIMATED FROM SEISMIC DATA
    LINDSEY, JP
    CRAFT, CI
    WORLD OIL, 1973, 177 (02) : 23 - 25
  • [9] Lithology and fluid prediction from amplitude versus offset (AVO) seismic data
    Davies, DJ
    McInalley, A
    Barclay, F
    GEOFLUIDS, 2003, 3 (04) : 219 - 232
  • [10] PARALLEL PROCESSING OF MULTICOMPONENT SEISMIC DATA
    Falfushinsky, V. V.
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2011, 47 (02) : 330 - 334