A reconstruction of Turkey's potential natural vegetation using climate indicators

被引:8
|
作者
Raja, Nussaibah B. [1 ]
Aydin, Olgu [2 ]
Cicek, Ihsan [2 ]
Turkoglu, Necla [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Ankara Univ, Fac Humanities, Dept Geog, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Biomes; Multinomial logistic regression; Statistical modelling; Turkey; Vegetation; USE/LAND-COVER CHANGES; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; CLASSIFICATION; FORESTS; MODEL; AREA;
D O I
10.1007/s11676-018-0855-7
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Turkey, containing three of the world's biodiversity hotspots, is a hub for genetic biodiversity. However, the vegetation cover has drastically changed in recent decades as a result of substantial transformations in land-use practices. A map of the potential natural vegetation can be used to represent the biodiversity of a country, and therefore a reference to effectively develop conservation strategies. The multinomial logistic regression is used to simulate the probability of different biomes occurring in the country using elevation, climatological data and natural vegetation data. A correlation test was applied to the climatological data to determine which predictors influence vegetation the most. These were temperature, precipitation, relative humidity and cloudiness. The Ordinary Kriging method was employed to transform the data into the format for the multinomial logistic regression model. The model showed that temperature was the most influencing factor with respect to Turkey's vegetation and distribution follows a similar distribution as the various macroclimates. Broadleaf forests are mostly found in the Black Sea region, which is also the wettest region of the country. The Marmara region is the only other region where there are broadleaf forests. Mixed forests and shrublands are mostly located in Central Anatolia due to the region's low humidity which favours herbaceous flora. Coniferous forests were dominant in the Aegean and Mediterranean regions, attributed to high temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:2199 / 2211
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A reconstruction of Turkey's potential natural vegetation using climate indicators
    Nussa?bah B.Raja
    Olgu Aydin
    ?hsan ?i?ek
    Necla Türko?lu
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 30 (06) : 2199 - 2211
  • [2] A reconstruction of Turkey’s potential natural vegetation using climate indicators
    Nussaïbah B. Raja
    Olgu Aydin
    İhsan Çiçek
    Necla Türkoğlu
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 30 : 2199 - 2211
  • [3] THE CLIMATE AND VEGETATION OF TURKEY
    AKMAN, Y
    KETENOGLU, O
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH SECTION B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1986, 89 : 123 - 134
  • [4] An objective methodology for potential vegetation reconstruction constrained by climate
    Levavasseur, G.
    Vrac, M.
    Roche, D. M.
    Paillard, D.
    Guiot, J.
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2013, 104 : 7 - 22
  • [5] Quantifying the impact of global climate change on potential natural vegetation
    Sykes, MT
    Prentice, IC
    Laarif, F
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1999, 41 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [6] Quantifying the Impact of Global Climate Change on Potential Natural Vegetation
    Martin T. Sykes
    I. Colin Prentice
    Fouzia Laarif
    Climatic Change, 1999, 41 : 37 - 52
  • [7] Climate-Adapted Potential Vegetation-A European Multiclass Model Estimating the Future Potential of Natural Vegetation
    Hinze, Jonas
    Albrecht, Axel
    Michiels, Hans-Gerhard
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [8] Climate reconstruction analysis using coexistence likelihood estimation (CRACLE): A method for the estimation of climate using vegetation
    Harbert, Robert S.
    Nixon, Kevin C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2015, 102 (08) : 1277 - 1289
  • [9] CLIMATE RECONSTRUCTION BASED ON BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS
    WOODCOCK, DW
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1992, 67 (04): : 457 - 477
  • [10] Effects of recent climate trends on the distribution of potential natural vegetation in Central Germany
    Johannes Franke
    Barbara Köstner
    International Journal of Biometeorology, 2007, 52 : 139 - 147